8. Sınıf Matematik Ders Kitabının PISA Temel Matematik Beceri Seviyelerine Göre İncelenmesi

B. Şirin, Avni Yildiz
{"title":"8. Sınıf Matematik Ders Kitabının PISA Temel Matematik Beceri Seviyelerine Göre İncelenmesi","authors":"B. Şirin, Avni Yildiz","doi":"10.30703/cije.676100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Looking through the studies in our country, it is seen that teachers’ and students’ opinions have been received regarding the course books and in addition to all these, parents’ views have been received about course books. As for the aim of this research, it is to analyze the distributions of Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) basic mathematical skills levels (communication, devising strategies, representation, using symbols, reasoning and argumentation, and mathematizing) on the questions in one of the prevailing 8th Grade mathematics course books. Document review was used in this research. In order to analyze the questions, the course book was divided into two sections: content, assessment and evaluation. The resource which was subjected to document review is one of the Ministry of National Education 8th grade mathematics course books which were used during 2017-2018 academic year. Each skill was categorized between the Level 0 and Level 3. After the analysis, findings were converted to table under five learning domains and level distribution percentages of each skill were stated there. As a result of the research, it was seen that low level questions of six skills, studied generally in learning domains, were included predominantly in the course book. It was realized that especially low level questions were dominant in possibility learning domain. In accordance with the results obtained, researchers are suggested to study for these problems: \"How should we place PISA basic mathematical skills under five learning domains?\" and \"How should these skills differentiate according to learning domains?\".","PeriodicalId":397026,"journal":{"name":"Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.676100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Looking through the studies in our country, it is seen that teachers’ and students’ opinions have been received regarding the course books and in addition to all these, parents’ views have been received about course books. As for the aim of this research, it is to analyze the distributions of Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) basic mathematical skills levels (communication, devising strategies, representation, using symbols, reasoning and argumentation, and mathematizing) on the questions in one of the prevailing 8th Grade mathematics course books. Document review was used in this research. In order to analyze the questions, the course book was divided into two sections: content, assessment and evaluation. The resource which was subjected to document review is one of the Ministry of National Education 8th grade mathematics course books which were used during 2017-2018 academic year. Each skill was categorized between the Level 0 and Level 3. After the analysis, findings were converted to table under five learning domains and level distribution percentages of each skill were stated there. As a result of the research, it was seen that low level questions of six skills, studied generally in learning domains, were included predominantly in the course book. It was realized that especially low level questions were dominant in possibility learning domain. In accordance with the results obtained, researchers are suggested to study for these problems: "How should we place PISA basic mathematical skills under five learning domains?" and "How should these skills differentiate according to learning domains?".
纵观我国的研究,可以看到教师和学生对教材的看法,除了这些之外,家长对教材的看法也得到了听取。本研究的目的是分析国际学生评估项目(PISA)的基本数学技能水平(沟通、设计策略、表达、使用符号、推理和论证、数学化)在一本流行的八年级数学教材中的分布情况。本研究采用文献法。为了对问题进行分析,教材分为内容、评估和评价两个部分。此次文件审查的资源是2017-2018学年教育部八年级数学教材之一。每个技能都分为0级和3级。分析后,将结果转换为五个学习域下的表格,并在表格中说明每种技能的水平分布百分比。研究结果表明,一般在学习领域研究的六项技能的低水平问题主要包括在教材中。发现在可能性学习领域中,特低层次问题占主导地位。根据得到的结果,建议研究者研究“PISA基础数学技能应该如何划分在五个学习领域”和“这些技能应该如何根据学习领域进行区分”这两个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信