Equating Method for Small Sample: Comparative research on nominal weight mean and linear method

D. Iriyadi, W. Rahayu, D. S. Naga
{"title":"Equating Method for Small Sample: Comparative research on nominal weight mean and linear method","authors":"D. Iriyadi, W. Rahayu, D. S. Naga","doi":"10.2991/ICETEP-18.2019.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the Nominal Weight Mean Equating and Linear methods on equating using a small sample as a tool for teachers to equate students' scores in the class. This research is included in comparative research comparing two equating methods. The number of samples each replication in this research is 30. The data in the study used the UN results for mathematics subjects in 2015 DKI Jakarta area with the number of anchor items 20% of the total items (30 items). From this data, replication is 50 times for each sample. By spreading the average RMSE for each sample according to replication, the small average RMSE value shows a stable measurement result. Among these methods of securing the class, the most stable is NWME. Thus, as a suggestion for teachers to use the NWME method to equalize scores to avoid students in different classes. Thus, discrimination against students can be prevented especially in determining the completeness of learning or graduation. Keywords—equating; small sample; RMSE; nominal weight mean; linear","PeriodicalId":220496,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2018)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ICETEP-18.2019.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the Nominal Weight Mean Equating and Linear methods on equating using a small sample as a tool for teachers to equate students' scores in the class. This research is included in comparative research comparing two equating methods. The number of samples each replication in this research is 30. The data in the study used the UN results for mathematics subjects in 2015 DKI Jakarta area with the number of anchor items 20% of the total items (30 items). From this data, replication is 50 times for each sample. By spreading the average RMSE for each sample according to replication, the small average RMSE value shows a stable measurement result. Among these methods of securing the class, the most stable is NWME. Thus, as a suggestion for teachers to use the NWME method to equalize scores to avoid students in different classes. Thus, discrimination against students can be prevented especially in determining the completeness of learning or graduation. Keywords—equating; small sample; RMSE; nominal weight mean; linear
小样本方程化法:名义权均值法与线性法的比较研究
本研究的目的是确定名义权重均值相等和线性相等方法的有效性,使用小样本作为教师在课堂上相等学生分数的工具。本研究属于比较两种等价方法的比较研究。本研究每次复制的样本数量为30个。研究中的数据使用了2015年DKI雅加达地区数学科目的联合国结果,锚项目数量占总项目的20%(30个项目)。根据该数据,每个样本的复制次数为50次。通过对每个样本的平均RMSE进行复制,得到的较小的平均RMSE值表示稳定的测量结果。在这些保护类的方法中,最稳定的是NWME。因此,建议教师使用NWME方法来平衡分数,避免学生在不同的班级。因此,可以防止对学生的歧视,特别是在确定学习或毕业的完整性方面。Keywords-equating;小样本;RMSE;标称重量平均值;线性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信