Author’s Being and Death: from Ancient Times to Postmodernism

Bohdan Khikhlushko
{"title":"Author’s Being and Death: from Ancient Times to Postmodernism","authors":"Bohdan Khikhlushko","doi":"10.28925/2412-2475.2023.21.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the concepts of “author” and “authorship” in literature in terms of his birth, evolution, decline, and return. The problem of authorship in literary studies is related to the question of approaches to textual research: should we pay attention to the author’s personality, what place does the author occupy in the author-text-reader relationship, and is it possible to completely abandon the author in favour of the reader or the text? The subject of the study is the concept of “author” in literature in the context of the historical development of the phenomenon of authorship. The purpose of the study is an attempt to comprehensively analyse the phenomenon of authorship, its evolution, and to compare different theories and approaches to the study of literary authorship. Anglo-American literary critics (E. Bennett, S. Burke, and J. Frow), considering the issue of authorship, include in their searches the early epochs – Antiquity and the Middle Ages, where there were proto-models of authorship. The figure of the author as an independent creator whose ideas are presented in his literary work wereconsolidated in the Modern period. This was facilitated, in particular, by the invention of printing and copyright. In Romanticism, the concept of “author” is more developed. Here, the author appears as a carrier of original ideas, and the literary work is a real reflection of his thoughts and inspiration. The development of modernism is undergoing dramatic changes. In the twentieth century, representatives of the formal school of literary criticism, the new criticism, determined that a work cannot be explained solely by the author’s personality. Besides, the focus was on the text and later on the reader. The works of R. Barth and M. Foucault reached their apogee without author-centered approach in the 1960s. At the end of the century, literary critics resumed an active discussion about the place of the author, considering the “death of the author” to be too radical. The study uses the historical method to trace the evolution of the phenomenon of authorship, the comparative method to help establish logical connections between different theories, and the method of analysis. In the course of the study, the author identifies the periods of development of authorship and the specific features inherent in each of them. In particular, the author identifies the characteristic features of authorship in the ancient era, the Middle Ages, the Renaissance, Romanticism, Realism, Modernism, and Postmodernism. An important element of the work is the establishment of relationships between different theories of authorship in the twentieth century, where there is a struggle with traditional ideas about the author. Based on the research of S. Burke, it is determined that the transition from author to text and reader was carried out gradually during the first half of the twentieth century. The “death of the author” was the result of the work of many literary schools, and R. Barthes summarized it in a rather radical form. The author’s rapid return to the discourse is due to the impossibility of solving the issue of text interpretation by completely ignoring the author, in particular the peculiarities of his individual style. The novelty of the work lies in an attempt to take a global historical view of the problem of authorship, since authorship is more often discussed in the context of the twentieth century. The obtained results will help to better understand the reasons for the decline of the phenomenon of authorship and its revival, as well as to understand the variability of approaches in the study of literary texts.","PeriodicalId":120787,"journal":{"name":"LITERARY PROCESS: methodology, names, trends","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LITERARY PROCESS: methodology, names, trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2475.2023.21.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the concepts of “author” and “authorship” in literature in terms of his birth, evolution, decline, and return. The problem of authorship in literary studies is related to the question of approaches to textual research: should we pay attention to the author’s personality, what place does the author occupy in the author-text-reader relationship, and is it possible to completely abandon the author in favour of the reader or the text? The subject of the study is the concept of “author” in literature in the context of the historical development of the phenomenon of authorship. The purpose of the study is an attempt to comprehensively analyse the phenomenon of authorship, its evolution, and to compare different theories and approaches to the study of literary authorship. Anglo-American literary critics (E. Bennett, S. Burke, and J. Frow), considering the issue of authorship, include in their searches the early epochs – Antiquity and the Middle Ages, where there were proto-models of authorship. The figure of the author as an independent creator whose ideas are presented in his literary work wereconsolidated in the Modern period. This was facilitated, in particular, by the invention of printing and copyright. In Romanticism, the concept of “author” is more developed. Here, the author appears as a carrier of original ideas, and the literary work is a real reflection of his thoughts and inspiration. The development of modernism is undergoing dramatic changes. In the twentieth century, representatives of the formal school of literary criticism, the new criticism, determined that a work cannot be explained solely by the author’s personality. Besides, the focus was on the text and later on the reader. The works of R. Barth and M. Foucault reached their apogee without author-centered approach in the 1960s. At the end of the century, literary critics resumed an active discussion about the place of the author, considering the “death of the author” to be too radical. The study uses the historical method to trace the evolution of the phenomenon of authorship, the comparative method to help establish logical connections between different theories, and the method of analysis. In the course of the study, the author identifies the periods of development of authorship and the specific features inherent in each of them. In particular, the author identifies the characteristic features of authorship in the ancient era, the Middle Ages, the Renaissance, Romanticism, Realism, Modernism, and Postmodernism. An important element of the work is the establishment of relationships between different theories of authorship in the twentieth century, where there is a struggle with traditional ideas about the author. Based on the research of S. Burke, it is determined that the transition from author to text and reader was carried out gradually during the first half of the twentieth century. The “death of the author” was the result of the work of many literary schools, and R. Barthes summarized it in a rather radical form. The author’s rapid return to the discourse is due to the impossibility of solving the issue of text interpretation by completely ignoring the author, in particular the peculiarities of his individual style. The novelty of the work lies in an attempt to take a global historical view of the problem of authorship, since authorship is more often discussed in the context of the twentieth century. The obtained results will help to better understand the reasons for the decline of the phenomenon of authorship and its revival, as well as to understand the variability of approaches in the study of literary texts.
作者的存在与死亡:从古代到后现代主义
本文从作者的诞生、演变、衰落和回归等方面考察了文学中“作者”和“作者身份”的概念。文学研究中的作者身份问题涉及到考据研究方法的问题:我们是否应该关注作者的个性,作者在作者-文本-读者关系中处于什么位置,是否有可能完全抛弃作者而偏向读者或文本?本文研究的主题是在作者身份现象的历史发展背景下文学中“作者”的概念。本研究的目的是试图全面分析作者身份现象及其演变,并比较不同的文学作者身份研究理论和方法。英美文学评论家(E. Bennett, S. Burke和J. Frow)在考虑作者身份问题时,在他们的研究中包括了早期的时代——古代和中世纪,那里有作者身份的原型模型。作者作为一个独立的创造者的形象,其思想在其文学作品中得到了体现,在现代得到了巩固。印刷术和版权的发明尤其促进了这一点。在浪漫主义中,“作者”的概念更为发达。在这里,作者作为原创思想的载体出现,文学作品是作者思想和灵感的真实反映。现代主义的发展正经历着巨大的变化。在20世纪,文学批评流派的代表人物,新批评派,认为一部作品不能仅仅用作者的个性来解释。此外,重点是文本,然后是读者。巴尔思(R. Barth)和福柯(M. Foucault)的作品在没有以作者为中心的方法的情况下,在20世纪60年代达到了顶峰。世纪末,文学评论家重新开始积极讨论作者的位置,认为“作者之死”过于激进。本研究采用历史的方法追溯作者现象的演变,采用比较的方法帮助建立不同理论之间的逻辑联系,采用分析的方法。在研究过程中,作者确定了作者身份的发展时期以及每个时期所固有的具体特征。作者特别指出了古代、中世纪、文艺复兴、浪漫主义、现实主义、现代主义和后现代主义时期作者身份的特征。本书的一个重要内容是建立了20世纪不同作者身份理论之间的关系,这与关于作者的传统观念存在着斗争。通过对S. Burke的研究,可以确定从作者到文本和读者的转变是在20世纪上半叶逐步进行的。“作者之死”是许多文学流派的成果,巴尔特斯以一种相当激进的形式对其进行了总结。作者之所以能迅速回归话语,是因为完全忽视作者,尤其是作者个人风格的特殊性,是不可能解决文本解读问题的。这项工作的新颖之处在于试图从全球历史的角度来看待作者身份问题,因为作者身份更多地是在20世纪的背景下讨论的。本文的研究结果将有助于更好地理解作者身份现象的衰落和复兴的原因,以及理解文学文本研究方法的可变性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信