Beyond the Barriers of Nature: Critical analysis of views on God’s Existence in various religions

R. Rafique, N. Abas
{"title":"Beyond the Barriers of Nature: Critical analysis of views on God’s Existence in various religions","authors":"R. Rafique, N. Abas","doi":"10.33422/5icrbs.2018.12.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reports critical overview of views on existence of God and naturalism. Theists argue the existence of God, atheists insist nonexistence of God, while agnostics claim the existence of God is unknowable, and even if exists, it is neither possible to demonstrate His existence nor likely to refute this spiritual theology. The argument that the existence of God can be known to all, even before exposure to any divine revelation, predates before Islam, Christianity and even Judaism. Pharos deity claim shows that the concept of deity existed long before major religions. History shows the Greek philosophers also tried to explore God before, during and after the prophet’s revolution in Mesopotamia. Today presupposition apologetical doctrine (Abram Kuyper) ponders and defends the existence of God. They conclude the necessary condition of belief to be exposed to revelation that atheists deny calling transcendental necessity. Human experience and action is proof of God’s existence as His existence is the necessary condition of human being’s intelligibility. The spirituality exists in all human sub-consciousness and sometimes, reveals to consciousness of some individuals. Human being’s inability to conceive the cosmos shows that there exist more types of creatures in different parts of universe. Enlightened men’s capability to resurrect corpse proves soul’s immortality. Questions like poor or the intelligent design and external or internal search for exposure of revelation have been discussed in context of theism and atheism doctrines. Based on philosophical views it will be endeavored to imagine beyond time-space barriers.","PeriodicalId":185410,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The 5th International Conference on Research in Behavioral and Social Science","volume":"151 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The 5th International Conference on Research in Behavioral and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/5icrbs.2018.12.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article reports critical overview of views on existence of God and naturalism. Theists argue the existence of God, atheists insist nonexistence of God, while agnostics claim the existence of God is unknowable, and even if exists, it is neither possible to demonstrate His existence nor likely to refute this spiritual theology. The argument that the existence of God can be known to all, even before exposure to any divine revelation, predates before Islam, Christianity and even Judaism. Pharos deity claim shows that the concept of deity existed long before major religions. History shows the Greek philosophers also tried to explore God before, during and after the prophet’s revolution in Mesopotamia. Today presupposition apologetical doctrine (Abram Kuyper) ponders and defends the existence of God. They conclude the necessary condition of belief to be exposed to revelation that atheists deny calling transcendental necessity. Human experience and action is proof of God’s existence as His existence is the necessary condition of human being’s intelligibility. The spirituality exists in all human sub-consciousness and sometimes, reveals to consciousness of some individuals. Human being’s inability to conceive the cosmos shows that there exist more types of creatures in different parts of universe. Enlightened men’s capability to resurrect corpse proves soul’s immortality. Questions like poor or the intelligent design and external or internal search for exposure of revelation have been discussed in context of theism and atheism doctrines. Based on philosophical views it will be endeavored to imagine beyond time-space barriers.
超越自然的障碍:对不同宗教中上帝存在观的批判性分析
本文对上帝存在论和自然主义的观点进行了批判性的综述。有神论者认为上帝存在,无神论者坚持上帝不存在,而不可知论者声称上帝的存在是不可知的,即使存在,也不可能证明他的存在,也不可能反驳这种精神神学。上帝的存在可以为所有人所知,甚至在任何神的启示出现之前,这种观点早于伊斯兰教、基督教甚至犹太教。法罗斯的神性主张表明,神的概念早在主要宗教之前就存在了。历史表明,在美索不达米亚先知革命之前、期间和之后,希腊哲学家也试图探索上帝。今天,预设护教教义(亚伯兰·凯波尔)思考并捍卫上帝的存在。他们得出结论,信仰的必要条件是暴露于启示,无神论者否认称之为先验的必要性。人的经验和行为是上帝存在的证明,因为上帝的存在是人的可理解性的必要条件。精神性存在于所有人的潜意识中,有时会显现到某些个体的意识中。人类无法想象宇宙,说明在宇宙的不同部分存在着更多种类的生物。开明的人复活尸体的能力证明了灵魂的不朽。在有神论和无神论教义的背景下,讨论了诸如贫穷或智能设计以及外部或内部对启示暴露的搜索等问题。基于哲学观点,它将努力想象超越时空的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书