Approval of the text and its legal applications

Ayed Salem Alnashawy
{"title":"Approval of the text and its legal applications","authors":"Ayed Salem Alnashawy","doi":"10.25255/ss.2022.11.2.62.81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study showed the concept of approval, linguistically and idiomatically, and then the types of approval. It is the desirability of the text (the effect), the desirability of consensus, the desirability of custom or habit, the desirability of necessity, and the desirability of analogy. Approval or is it a matter of establishing the ruling with evidence and not approving, the result of the study was that approbation of the text (the effect) is not considered approbation in the idiomatic sense known to scholars of origins, but rather it is a ruling proven by evidence from the book or Sunnah, taking into account the honorable law for the benefit of the people, and the evidence is not approbation In its fundamentalist sense, which is based on the diligence of the mujtahid in what is not stipulated in the text, it is an act of pure evidence.","PeriodicalId":290734,"journal":{"name":"April 2022 Issue","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"April 2022 Issue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25255/ss.2022.11.2.62.81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study showed the concept of approval, linguistically and idiomatically, and then the types of approval. It is the desirability of the text (the effect), the desirability of consensus, the desirability of custom or habit, the desirability of necessity, and the desirability of analogy. Approval or is it a matter of establishing the ruling with evidence and not approving, the result of the study was that approbation of the text (the effect) is not considered approbation in the idiomatic sense known to scholars of origins, but rather it is a ruling proven by evidence from the book or Sunnah, taking into account the honorable law for the benefit of the people, and the evidence is not approbation In its fundamentalist sense, which is based on the diligence of the mujtahid in what is not stipulated in the text, it is an act of pure evidence.
批准文本及其法律适用
该研究从语言学和习惯上展示了认可的概念,然后是认可的类型。它是文本的可取性(效果),共识的可取性,习俗或习惯的可取性,必要性的可取性以及类比的可取性。认可或者是有证据而不认可的裁决,研究的结果是,对文本的认可(效果)不被认为是起源学者所熟知的习惯意义上的认可,而是由来自书或圣训的证据证明的裁决,考虑到为人民谋福利的光荣法律,证据不是原教旨主义意义上的认可。这是基于圣战者的勤奋,在文本中没有规定,这是一个纯粹的证据行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信