FROM STATE TO STATELESS AND THEN COMING BACK TO STATE AGAIN: THE CURIOUS CASE OF KOCH BIHAR/COOCH BEHAR/KAMATAPUR

Nirban Ray
{"title":"FROM STATE TO STATELESS AND THEN COMING BACK TO STATE AGAIN: THE CURIOUS CASE OF KOCH BIHAR/COOCH BEHAR/KAMATAPUR","authors":"Nirban Ray","doi":"10.47509/scdi.2022.v02i01.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fundamental concern in attempting to understand the state in India or the Indian state can be said to revolve around a shift, a transfer or shifting of the state from the Mughals to the Britishers. Various attempts have been made to understand or examine this shift from Mughal sovereignty and governance to that of British forms. By means of this examination, in fact, attempts have been made to understand fundamentally the very idea of ‘state’ in an Indian or more so in an Asian context. This paper will focus upon the shifting of the state in the Bengal borderland or frontiers and its implications on smaller, native (princely) and peripheral states. In other words, beginning with the bigger, major, fundamental concerns of state in India, I will in this paper eventually delve into the concerns of smaller, minor states, standing in the periphery of Indian territory and in the frontiers of Asian nation-states. In the context of African Tribal societies, Aidon Southal invented a new form of state called the ‘segmentary state’. Burton Stein, while working on the pre-colonial state including the Mughal state, elaborates the concept of ‘segmentary state’ by means of the case examples of the Southern states of Chola and Vijayanagara. Taking the clue from Southal, Stein asserts that the Chola and Vijayanagara regime or these states were not states in terms of real power but, it didn’t stop them from being a state nonetheless- although only nominally. In other words, the concept of ‘segmentary state’ focuses upon states within a state. It aims to understand the nature of state from the perspective of the periphery. The analysis and approach to understand the state from the perspective of the periphery differs fundamentally from the analysis or approach which seeks to understand the state from above or from the mainland. In this paper, I will elaborate this, first by an exploration of the state of Bengal, then, moving towards the periphery through an exploration of the Ahom state and finally, I will solely focus on the case of the Koch Bihar/Cooch Behar/Kamatapur state, which this study considers as a peculiar case from the periphery of the periphery.","PeriodicalId":378976,"journal":{"name":"SOCIETY AND CULTURE DEVELOPMENT IN INDIA","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOCIETY AND CULTURE DEVELOPMENT IN INDIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47509/scdi.2022.v02i01.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fundamental concern in attempting to understand the state in India or the Indian state can be said to revolve around a shift, a transfer or shifting of the state from the Mughals to the Britishers. Various attempts have been made to understand or examine this shift from Mughal sovereignty and governance to that of British forms. By means of this examination, in fact, attempts have been made to understand fundamentally the very idea of ‘state’ in an Indian or more so in an Asian context. This paper will focus upon the shifting of the state in the Bengal borderland or frontiers and its implications on smaller, native (princely) and peripheral states. In other words, beginning with the bigger, major, fundamental concerns of state in India, I will in this paper eventually delve into the concerns of smaller, minor states, standing in the periphery of Indian territory and in the frontiers of Asian nation-states. In the context of African Tribal societies, Aidon Southal invented a new form of state called the ‘segmentary state’. Burton Stein, while working on the pre-colonial state including the Mughal state, elaborates the concept of ‘segmentary state’ by means of the case examples of the Southern states of Chola and Vijayanagara. Taking the clue from Southal, Stein asserts that the Chola and Vijayanagara regime or these states were not states in terms of real power but, it didn’t stop them from being a state nonetheless- although only nominally. In other words, the concept of ‘segmentary state’ focuses upon states within a state. It aims to understand the nature of state from the perspective of the periphery. The analysis and approach to understand the state from the perspective of the periphery differs fundamentally from the analysis or approach which seeks to understand the state from above or from the mainland. In this paper, I will elaborate this, first by an exploration of the state of Bengal, then, moving towards the periphery through an exploration of the Ahom state and finally, I will solely focus on the case of the Koch Bihar/Cooch Behar/Kamatapur state, which this study considers as a peculiar case from the periphery of the periphery.
从国家到无国家,然后又回到国家:科赫比哈尔/库奇行为/卡玛塔普尔的奇怪案例
试图理解印度或印度国家的根本问题可以说是围绕着从莫卧儿到英国人的转变,转移或转移。人们做了各种尝试来理解或研究这种从莫卧儿主权和治理到英国形式的转变。事实上,通过这种考察,人们试图从根本上理解印度或亚洲背景下的“国家”概念。本文将集中讨论孟加拉边境或边界的国家转移及其对较小的,本土(王子)和周边国家的影响。换句话说,从印度国家更大、更主要、更根本的问题开始,我将在本文中最终深入研究那些位于印度领土边缘和亚洲民族国家边界的较小、次要国家的问题。在非洲部落社会的背景下,Aidon Southal发明了一种新的国家形式,称为“分段国家”。Burton Stein在研究包括莫卧儿王朝在内的前殖民国家时,通过南部的Chola和Vijayanagara州的案例来阐述“分段国家”的概念。根据索萨尔的线索,斯坦断言,就实权而言,乔拉和维查亚纳加拉政权或这些邦不是国家,但这并没有阻止它们成为一个国家——尽管只是名义上的。换句话说,“分段状态”的概念关注的是一个状态中的状态。它旨在从边缘的角度来理解国家的本质。从边缘的角度来理解国家的分析和方法与从上层或大陆的角度来理解国家的分析和方法有着根本的不同。在本文中,我将阐述这一点,首先通过对孟加拉邦的探索,然后,通过对阿洪邦的探索走向边缘,最后,我将只关注科赫比哈尔邦/库奇比哈尔邦/卡马塔普尔邦的案例,本研究认为这是一个来自边缘边缘的特殊案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信