Alles eine Frage des Trainings - Lungenultraschall bei Neugeborenen

Abstract

Background: Respiratory distress (RD) is the most common neonatal illness. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a technique previously tested in neonatal studies on RD, but literature regarding its routine clinical applicability is still lacking. Objective: To assess the concordance between LUS performed by neonatologists with different training levels and chest X-ray (CXR) for the diagnosis of RD in newborns during the first 24 h of life. Methods: We enrolled newborns with RD during the first 24 h of life. Patients under went LUS and CXR. LUS and CXR diagnosis were compared to evaluate concordance. Twenty percent of patients received two LUS (one from an experienced and one from a novice sonographer) to calculate the interobserver agreement. The difference in time needed to reach a diagnosis with LUS and CXR, and from novice and expert operators, was measured. Results: We studied 124 patients; 134 diagnoses were reported. The concordance between LUS and CXR diagnosis was 91% (95% CI 86-96%) with a κ statistic of 0.88 (95% CI 0.81-0.94). The median time to diagnosis was shorter for LUS (9.5 min, IQR 5-15) than for CXR (50 min, IQR 33-64) (p < 0.0001). In 25/124 patients, LUS was performed by both novice and experienced sonographers with complete concordance. The median time to diagnosis was shorter for expert (9 min, IQR 5-15) than novice operators (15 min, IQR 10-20) (p < 0.0002). Conclusion: LUS and CXR have a high concordance in the differential diagnosis of neonatal RD in the first 24 h of life. LUS has a shorter operation time than CXR.