Controlling Religious Knowledge and Education for Countering Religious Extremism – Case study of the Uyghur Muslims in China

Dilmurat Mahmut
{"title":"Controlling Religious Knowledge and Education for Countering Religious Extremism – Case study of the Uyghur Muslims in China","authors":"Dilmurat Mahmut","doi":"10.32865/FIRE201951142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a secularist state, China has always been highly sensitive about religious traditions, particularly Islam. During the late 1990s and especially after the 9/11 terrorist events, the government rhetoric has been to equate the Islamic knowledge and identity with violent ethnic separatism, and more recently extremism and terrorism (Roberts, 2016, 2018). Thus, the Uyghurs’ right to access Islamic knowledge and practice Islam has been increasingly restricted and diminished (Cook, 2017; Millward, 2018). After reviewing the recent history of Chinese rhetoric and policies regarding the religious education in Xinjiang, this article discusses the possible ramifications of such developments, via the lenses of post-colonialism, the Politics of Recognition (Taylor, 1994), the push and pull factors that trigger radicalization, and religious literacy.  Meanwhile, through sharing the perspectives of the Uyghur diaspora in Canada, the author also highlights that current Chinese policies and practices could deepen the “us” vs. “them” dichotomy between the Muslim Uyghurs and the majority Han population as well as the Chinese state, therefore creating more tension in society.","PeriodicalId":232875,"journal":{"name":"FIRE: Forum for International Research in Education","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FIRE: Forum for International Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32865/FIRE201951142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

As a secularist state, China has always been highly sensitive about religious traditions, particularly Islam. During the late 1990s and especially after the 9/11 terrorist events, the government rhetoric has been to equate the Islamic knowledge and identity with violent ethnic separatism, and more recently extremism and terrorism (Roberts, 2016, 2018). Thus, the Uyghurs’ right to access Islamic knowledge and practice Islam has been increasingly restricted and diminished (Cook, 2017; Millward, 2018). After reviewing the recent history of Chinese rhetoric and policies regarding the religious education in Xinjiang, this article discusses the possible ramifications of such developments, via the lenses of post-colonialism, the Politics of Recognition (Taylor, 1994), the push and pull factors that trigger radicalization, and religious literacy.  Meanwhile, through sharing the perspectives of the Uyghur diaspora in Canada, the author also highlights that current Chinese policies and practices could deepen the “us” vs. “them” dichotomy between the Muslim Uyghurs and the majority Han population as well as the Chinese state, therefore creating more tension in society.
控制宗教知识与教育,打击宗教极端主义——以中国维吾尔族穆斯林为例
作为一个世俗主义国家,中国一直对宗教传统,尤其是伊斯兰教非常敏感。在20世纪90年代末,特别是在9/11恐怖事件之后,政府的言论一直是将伊斯兰的知识和身份等同于暴力的民族分离主义,以及最近的极端主义和恐怖主义(罗伯茨,2016年,2018年)。因此,维吾尔人获得伊斯兰知识和实践伊斯兰教的权利日益受到限制和削弱(Cook, 2017;明,2018)。在回顾了中国关于新疆宗教教育的言论和政策的近代史之后,本文通过后殖民主义、承认政治(Taylor, 1994)、引发激进化的推动和拉动因素以及宗教素养的镜头,讨论了这种发展可能产生的后果。同时,通过分享在加拿大的维吾尔人的观点,作者还强调,目前中国的政策和做法可能会加深穆斯林维吾尔人与多数汉族人口以及中国政府之间的“我们”与“他们”的二分法,从而在社会中制造更多的紧张局势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信