ATHENa - Automated Tool for Hardware EvaluatioN: Toward Fair and Comprehensive Benchmarking of Cryptographic Hardware Using FPGAs

K. Gaj, J. Kaps, Venkata Amirineni, M. Rogawski, Ekawat Homsirikamol, Benjamin Y. Brewster
{"title":"ATHENa - Automated Tool for Hardware EvaluatioN: Toward Fair and Comprehensive Benchmarking of Cryptographic Hardware Using FPGAs","authors":"K. Gaj, J. Kaps, Venkata Amirineni, M. Rogawski, Ekawat Homsirikamol, Benjamin Y. Brewster","doi":"10.1109/FPL.2010.86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A fair comparison of functionally equivalent digital system designs targeting FPGAs is a challenging and time consuming task. The results of the comparison depend on the inherent properties of competing algorithms, as well as on selected hardware architectures, implementation techniques, FPGA families, languages and tools. In this paper, we introduce an open-source environment, called ATHENa for fair, comprehensive, automated, and collaborative hardware benchmarking of algorithms belonging to the same class. As our first goal, we select the benchmarking of algorithms belonging to the area of cryptography. Algorithms from this area have been shown to achieve significant speed-ups and security gains compared to software when implemented in FPGAs. The capabilities of our environment are demonstrated using three examples: two different hardware architectures of the current cryptographic hash function standard, SHA-256, and one architecture of a candidate for the new standard, Fugue. All source codes, testbenches, and configuration files necessary to repeat experiments described in this paper are made available through the project web site.","PeriodicalId":171235,"journal":{"name":"2010 International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"92","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FPL.2010.86","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 92

Abstract

A fair comparison of functionally equivalent digital system designs targeting FPGAs is a challenging and time consuming task. The results of the comparison depend on the inherent properties of competing algorithms, as well as on selected hardware architectures, implementation techniques, FPGA families, languages and tools. In this paper, we introduce an open-source environment, called ATHENa for fair, comprehensive, automated, and collaborative hardware benchmarking of algorithms belonging to the same class. As our first goal, we select the benchmarking of algorithms belonging to the area of cryptography. Algorithms from this area have been shown to achieve significant speed-ups and security gains compared to software when implemented in FPGAs. The capabilities of our environment are demonstrated using three examples: two different hardware architectures of the current cryptographic hash function standard, SHA-256, and one architecture of a candidate for the new standard, Fugue. All source codes, testbenches, and configuration files necessary to repeat experiments described in this paper are made available through the project web site.
ATHENa -硬件评估的自动化工具:使用fpga对加密硬件进行公平和全面的基准测试
以fpga为目标的功能等效数字系统设计的公平比较是一项具有挑战性和耗时的任务。比较的结果取决于竞争算法的固有特性,以及所选择的硬件架构、实现技术、FPGA家族、语言和工具。在本文中,我们介绍了一个名为ATHENa的开源环境,用于公平、全面、自动化和协作的同类算法硬件基准测试。作为我们的第一个目标,我们选择属于密码学领域的算法的基准测试。与在fpga中实现的软件相比,该领域的算法已被证明可以实现显着的加速和安全性提升。我们使用三个示例演示了环境的功能:当前加密散列函数标准SHA-256的两个不同硬件体系结构,以及新标准候选的一个体系结构Fugue。所有的源代码、测试平台,以及重复本文中描述的实验所必需的配置文件,都可以通过项目网站获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书