COVID-19 in Afghanistan: Evaluating Health Vulnerability and Identifying Controlling Mechanism

Najibullah Omerkhil, Gulfam Sadiq, Nisar Ahmad Kohistani, A. Abidi, Gul Mina Azizi
{"title":"COVID-19 in Afghanistan: Evaluating Health Vulnerability and Identifying Controlling Mechanism","authors":"Najibullah Omerkhil, Gulfam Sadiq, Nisar Ahmad Kohistani, A. Abidi, Gul Mina Azizi","doi":"10.3126/qjmss.v3i2.41562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The insistent range of coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis and its permeation into least developed countries has escalated the bar of countries fragility and susceptibility. Afghanistan is amongst the most affected countries by the COVID-19 pandemic certainly due to its poor health infrastructure and conflict affected demography.\nObjective: This study intends to assess the health vulnerability profile and identifying the control mechanism of the north and northeast regions of Afghanistan using the IPCC framework.\nMethod: A pre-evaluated online questionnaire (Google form) and mobile survey of 361 households distributed in 8 provinces across the both zones to collected the primary data. Exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity covered the three main components of vulnerability index, weighing method of Iyenger and Sudershan is used to estimate the fabricate vulnerability index.\nResult: The province’s health vulnerability status was classified to the different groups based on beta distribution. Based on the vulnerability index, 62.5% of provinces were highly vulnerable, 25% moderately and 37.5% were least vulnerable.\nConclusion: In north-east region people were highly vulnerable to COVID-19 in terms of sensitivity and exposure, with low copping capacity to cope with COVID-19 pandemic risks compare to the north zone.\nRecommendation: Enhancing health and hygiene facilities and a handful of lowcost methods such as strengthen informal safety nets and introducing small-scale regional infrastructure projects, could be most cost effective and viable options.\nOriginality: The research work is original and has not been published in other publications. As well, no financial support has been received for the study.","PeriodicalId":383816,"journal":{"name":"Quest Journal of Management and Social Sciences","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quest Journal of Management and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/qjmss.v3i2.41562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The insistent range of coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis and its permeation into least developed countries has escalated the bar of countries fragility and susceptibility. Afghanistan is amongst the most affected countries by the COVID-19 pandemic certainly due to its poor health infrastructure and conflict affected demography. Objective: This study intends to assess the health vulnerability profile and identifying the control mechanism of the north and northeast regions of Afghanistan using the IPCC framework. Method: A pre-evaluated online questionnaire (Google form) and mobile survey of 361 households distributed in 8 provinces across the both zones to collected the primary data. Exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity covered the three main components of vulnerability index, weighing method of Iyenger and Sudershan is used to estimate the fabricate vulnerability index. Result: The province’s health vulnerability status was classified to the different groups based on beta distribution. Based on the vulnerability index, 62.5% of provinces were highly vulnerable, 25% moderately and 37.5% were least vulnerable. Conclusion: In north-east region people were highly vulnerable to COVID-19 in terms of sensitivity and exposure, with low copping capacity to cope with COVID-19 pandemic risks compare to the north zone. Recommendation: Enhancing health and hygiene facilities and a handful of lowcost methods such as strengthen informal safety nets and introducing small-scale regional infrastructure projects, could be most cost effective and viable options. Originality: The research work is original and has not been published in other publications. As well, no financial support has been received for the study.
2019冠状病毒病在阿富汗:评估健康脆弱性并确定控制机制
背景:冠状病毒(COVID-19)危机的持续范围及其向最不发达国家的渗透加剧了国家的脆弱性和易感性。阿富汗是受COVID-19大流行影响最严重的国家之一,这当然是由于其卫生基础设施薄弱和受冲突影响的人口。目的:本研究旨在利用IPCC框架评估阿富汗北部和东北部地区的健康脆弱性概况并确定控制机制。方法:采用预估的在线问卷(Google表格)和移动调查,对分布在两区8个省的361户家庭进行调查,收集初步数据。暴露、敏感性和适应能力是脆弱性指数的三个主要组成部分,采用Iyenger和Sudershan加权法对脆弱性指数进行估算。结果:根据beta分布对全省健康脆弱性状况进行了分组。根据脆弱性指数,62.5%的省份属于高度脆弱性,25%属于中等脆弱性,37.5%属于最不脆弱性。结论:东北地区人群对新冠肺炎的敏感性和暴露度较高,应对新冠肺炎大流行风险的能力低于北方地区。建议:加强保健和卫生设施以及少数低成本方法,如加强非正式安全网和引入小规模区域基础设施项目,可能是最具成本效益和可行的选择。原创性:研究工作是原创的,没有在其他出版物上发表过。同样,这项研究也没有收到任何财政支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信