Exploring academic resilience and scientific epistemological views among undergraduate students

Ahmed Anjum, Shafi Shawl Roman
{"title":"Exploring academic resilience and scientific epistemological views among undergraduate students","authors":"Ahmed Anjum, Shafi Shawl Roman","doi":"10.26634/jpsy.16.3.18939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Academic resilience can be defined as the capability of students to solve their problems in times of pressure, anxiety, stress, and other setbacks. It is imperative to have insight into academic resilience as students are involved in various obstacles in the field of education. Scientific epistemological views reflect the individual's beliefs pertaining to science, its qualities, methodologies, and the individual's acquisition process. The study was undertaken to determine the relationship between academic resilience and scientific epistemological views among undergraduate students. A sample of 200 undergraduate students, comprising 72 males and 128 females, was selected through simple random sampling from different faculties of Aligarh Muslim University. Two tools were used for data collection, Academic Resilience Scale (2010) and the Scientific Epistemological Views Scale (2005). For data analysis, Pearson's coefficient of correlation and the t-test were calculated. The results revealed that there exists no relationship between the two variables. In the case of academic resilience, a significant difference was found between the male and female groups, with female students coming out as more resilient than male students. However, in scientific epistemological views, no significant difference between male and female groups was found.","PeriodicalId":123621,"journal":{"name":"i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.16.3.18939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Academic resilience can be defined as the capability of students to solve their problems in times of pressure, anxiety, stress, and other setbacks. It is imperative to have insight into academic resilience as students are involved in various obstacles in the field of education. Scientific epistemological views reflect the individual's beliefs pertaining to science, its qualities, methodologies, and the individual's acquisition process. The study was undertaken to determine the relationship between academic resilience and scientific epistemological views among undergraduate students. A sample of 200 undergraduate students, comprising 72 males and 128 females, was selected through simple random sampling from different faculties of Aligarh Muslim University. Two tools were used for data collection, Academic Resilience Scale (2010) and the Scientific Epistemological Views Scale (2005). For data analysis, Pearson's coefficient of correlation and the t-test were calculated. The results revealed that there exists no relationship between the two variables. In the case of academic resilience, a significant difference was found between the male and female groups, with female students coming out as more resilient than male students. However, in scientific epistemological views, no significant difference between male and female groups was found.
大学生学术弹性与科学认识论观点之探讨
学业弹性可以定义为学生在面临压力、焦虑、压力和其他挫折时解决问题的能力。学生在教育领域面临着各种各样的障碍,因此有必要深入了解学业弹性。科学认识论观点反映了个人对科学、科学质量、科学方法和个人获取过程的信念。本研究旨在探讨大学生学术弹性与科学认识论观点之间的关系。本研究采用简单随机抽样的方法,从阿里格尔穆斯林大学的不同院系中抽取200名本科生,其中男生72人,女生128人。数据收集使用了两种工具:学术弹性量表(2010)和科学认识论观点量表(2005)。进行数据分析时,计算Pearson相关系数和t检验。结果表明,这两个变量之间不存在任何关系。在学业适应能力方面,男女学生之间存在显著差异,女学生比男学生更有适应能力。然而,在科学认识论的观点中,男性和女性群体之间没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信