Engaging citizens in digital public service innovation ecosystems - insights from the Netherlands and Italy

Nitesh Bharosa, F. Marangio, C. Petti, M. Janssen
{"title":"Engaging citizens in digital public service innovation ecosystems - insights from the Netherlands and Italy","authors":"Nitesh Bharosa, F. Marangio, C. Petti, M. Janssen","doi":"10.1145/3494193.3494269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public agencies struggle with engaging citizens in digital public service innovation. The notion that citizen engagement in public service innovation can lead to more citizen-friendly digital services is widely accepted. Moreover, citizen engagement has also become an indicator of legitimacy; public service innovation without citizen engagement is more likely to be scrutinized on public values like privacy, transparency, fairness, and citizen control. Yet it remains difficult to engage with citizens throughout the various stages of innovation. Often, the hard question of how to balance system performance and public values in innovation resurfaces, and we cannot leave it to software programmers to answer this question. This short paper reveals how the Netherlands and Italy are engaging citizens in public service innovation. We found that in both countries, the quadruple helix approach is gaining support and citizen engagement is increasingly becoming the norm rather than the exception. Both countries are gaining experience with new citizen engagement methods like user-driven prototyping and living labs. We found that these methods increase empathy, creativity and reflection on ethical dilemmas. Following such methods also signals to policymakers that a democratic process was followed, ultimately backing a specific innovation direction. Other countries looking to enhance citizen engagement in public services innovation can benefit from the insights presented in this paper.","PeriodicalId":360191,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3494193.3494269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Public agencies struggle with engaging citizens in digital public service innovation. The notion that citizen engagement in public service innovation can lead to more citizen-friendly digital services is widely accepted. Moreover, citizen engagement has also become an indicator of legitimacy; public service innovation without citizen engagement is more likely to be scrutinized on public values like privacy, transparency, fairness, and citizen control. Yet it remains difficult to engage with citizens throughout the various stages of innovation. Often, the hard question of how to balance system performance and public values in innovation resurfaces, and we cannot leave it to software programmers to answer this question. This short paper reveals how the Netherlands and Italy are engaging citizens in public service innovation. We found that in both countries, the quadruple helix approach is gaining support and citizen engagement is increasingly becoming the norm rather than the exception. Both countries are gaining experience with new citizen engagement methods like user-driven prototyping and living labs. We found that these methods increase empathy, creativity and reflection on ethical dilemmas. Following such methods also signals to policymakers that a democratic process was followed, ultimately backing a specific innovation direction. Other countries looking to enhance citizen engagement in public services innovation can benefit from the insights presented in this paper.
让公民参与数字公共服务创新生态系统——来自荷兰和意大利的见解
公共机构很难让公民参与到数字公共服务创新中来。公民参与公共服务创新可以带来更多对公民友好的数字服务的概念被广泛接受。此外,公民参与也已成为合法性的一个指标;没有公民参与的公共服务创新更有可能受到隐私、透明度、公平和公民控制等公共价值观的审查。然而,在创新的各个阶段,与公民接触仍然很困难。通常,如何在创新中平衡系统性能和公共价值的难题会重新出现,我们不能把这个问题留给软件程序员来回答。这篇短文揭示了荷兰和意大利如何让公民参与公共服务创新。我们发现,在这两个国家,“四螺旋”方法正在获得支持,公民参与正日益成为常态,而不是例外。两国都在用户驱动原型和生活实验室等新的公民参与方法方面积累了经验。我们发现这些方法增加了同理心、创造力和对道德困境的反思。采用这些方法也向政策制定者发出信号,表明遵循了民主进程,最终支持了特定的创新方向。其他希望加强公民参与公共服务创新的国家可以从本文提出的见解中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信