The Impact of Expectations about Automated and Manual Vehicles on Drivers’ Behavior: Insights from a Mixed Traffic Driving Simulator Study

Linda Miller, Ina Koniakowsky, J. Kraus, M. Baumann
{"title":"The Impact of Expectations about Automated and Manual Vehicles on Drivers’ Behavior: Insights from a Mixed Traffic Driving Simulator Study","authors":"Linda Miller, Ina Koniakowsky, J. Kraus, M. Baumann","doi":"10.1145/3543174.3546837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As drivers’ expectations guide their perception and behavior, violated expectations can lead to mistakes and discomfort. In this work, the role of expectations regarding drivers’ reactions to automated (AVs) and manual vehicles (MVs) was investigated. Interviews were conducted to explore expectations toward AVs and MVs. Then, drivers interacted with AVs and MVs in a multi-agent driving simulator. The vehicles yielded or insisted on the right-of-way, indicated by a lateral offset. Self-report data revealed that drivers expected AVs to drive second (yield) and MVs to drive first (insist) in narrow passages. Driving simulator data showed that driving behavior improved, i.e., faster passing time, higher average speed, and higher lateral position, when AVs yielded and matched drivers’ expectations, compared to MVs that behaved the same way. No improvement was found when MVs (vs. AVs) insisted on the right-of-way. Overall, yielding was evaluated more trustworthy and cooperative than insisting for both vehicle categories.","PeriodicalId":284749,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","volume":"378 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3543174.3546837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

As drivers’ expectations guide their perception and behavior, violated expectations can lead to mistakes and discomfort. In this work, the role of expectations regarding drivers’ reactions to automated (AVs) and manual vehicles (MVs) was investigated. Interviews were conducted to explore expectations toward AVs and MVs. Then, drivers interacted with AVs and MVs in a multi-agent driving simulator. The vehicles yielded or insisted on the right-of-way, indicated by a lateral offset. Self-report data revealed that drivers expected AVs to drive second (yield) and MVs to drive first (insist) in narrow passages. Driving simulator data showed that driving behavior improved, i.e., faster passing time, higher average speed, and higher lateral position, when AVs yielded and matched drivers’ expectations, compared to MVs that behaved the same way. No improvement was found when MVs (vs. AVs) insisted on the right-of-way. Overall, yielding was evaluated more trustworthy and cooperative than insisting for both vehicle categories.
对自动和手动车辆的期望对驾驶员行为的影响:来自混合交通驾驶模拟器研究的见解
由于司机的期望引导着他们的感知和行为,违反期望会导致错误和不适。在这项工作中,研究了期望对驾驶员对自动驾驶汽车(AVs)和手动驾驶汽车(mv)的反应的作用。通过访谈探讨对自动驾驶汽车和mv的期望。然后,在多智能体驾驶模拟器中,驾驶员与av和mv进行交互。车辆让出或坚持通行权,以横向偏移表示。自述数据显示,在狭窄的道路上,司机们希望自动驾驶排在第二位(屈服),而mv排在第一位(坚持)。驾驶模拟器数据显示,与表现相同的mv相比,当自动驾驶汽车满足并符合驾驶员的期望时,驾驶行为得到改善,即行驶时间更快,平均速度更高,横向位置更高。当mv (vs. av)坚持先行权时,没有发现任何改善。总体而言,在两种车辆类别中,屈服比坚持更值得信赖和合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信