A decision-making approach for the synthesis of results issued from different user interface evaluation methods

Marwa Hentati, Abdelwaheb Trabelsi, Selem Charfi
{"title":"A decision-making approach for the synthesis of results issued from different user interface evaluation methods","authors":"Marwa Hentati, Abdelwaheb Trabelsi, Selem Charfi","doi":"10.1109/ICTA.2013.6815296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evaluation of the interactive systems has been the subject of numerous researches during the last two decades. However, it still remains a difficult task to establish. Generally, evaluators exploit a single method to proceed to an interactive system evaluation. However, many authors assert that a single method is not enough to obtain relevant evaluation results. As a solution, we propose a decision-making approach for the synthesis of data collected by different evaluation methods to obtain more reliable evaluation results. The proposed approach is based on three evaluation methods: the questionnaire, the ergonomic quality inspection and the electronic informer. As an evaluation result, the proposed approach provides evaluators with the quantification of the evaluation dimensions: the usability and the system functionality degree.","PeriodicalId":188977,"journal":{"name":"Fourth International Conference on Information and Communication Technology and Accessibility (ICTA)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fourth International Conference on Information and Communication Technology and Accessibility (ICTA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTA.2013.6815296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The evaluation of the interactive systems has been the subject of numerous researches during the last two decades. However, it still remains a difficult task to establish. Generally, evaluators exploit a single method to proceed to an interactive system evaluation. However, many authors assert that a single method is not enough to obtain relevant evaluation results. As a solution, we propose a decision-making approach for the synthesis of data collected by different evaluation methods to obtain more reliable evaluation results. The proposed approach is based on three evaluation methods: the questionnaire, the ergonomic quality inspection and the electronic informer. As an evaluation result, the proposed approach provides evaluators with the quantification of the evaluation dimensions: the usability and the system functionality degree.
一种综合不同用户界面评价方法结果的决策方法
在过去的二十年中,对交互系统的评估一直是众多研究的主题。然而,建立这一制度仍然是一项艰巨的任务。通常,评估人员利用单一方法进行交互式系统评估。然而,许多作者认为,单一的方法不足以获得相关的评价结果。为此,我们提出了一种决策方法,将不同评价方法收集的数据进行综合,以获得更可靠的评价结果。该方法基于三种评价方法:问卷调查法、人机工程质量检验法和电子检波器法。作为评估结果,该方法为评估人员提供了量化的评估维度:可用性和系统功能度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信