Identification from bite marks in a sexual assault case involving multiple assailants by DNA profiling

Rajinderpal Singh, Pankaj Mahla, R. K. Gorea, Sarabjeet Singh, Y. Sharma
{"title":"Identification from bite marks in a sexual assault case involving multiple assailants by DNA profiling","authors":"Rajinderpal Singh, Pankaj Mahla, R. K. Gorea, Sarabjeet Singh, Y. Sharma","doi":"10.18099/IJETV.V3I1.8797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bite mark evidence is often introduced as being close to DNA in terms of accuracy. Bite marks are generally found at the scene of violent crime murders, sexual assaults and are an extremely difficult process to collect the bite marks/saliva sample very lightly, otherwise, only victim profile will be generated. On examination of victim's right breast, a patterned injury was discovered and determined to be from adult male’s teeth. Evidence was collected by the forensic doctor according to established techniques including recovery of saliva from the bite mark area despite the body. DNA analysis by PCR using polymorphic STR markers revealed a DNA profile of mixed origin. With the advent of more sensitive typing methodologies, fingernails clipping for foreign DNA, as well as swabs collected from the area on the victim's body (kissed, licked, genital area, bitten area from breast and lips), are analyzed. In addition, finger swabs for nail scrapping in the case of digital penetration could also be collected from the suspect for DNA analysis, findings new repeats of DNA. Generally, Victim’s DNA profile, a genotype contribution from the perpetrator was identified as a minor component. Thus the DNA typing results from the bite mark correlated with the DNA typing results obtained from other biological trace evidence identified from the victim's genital samples. The bite mark and the DNA evidence were used to screen suspects and played an important role in obtaining resolution of this case. In this study DNA profiled from the breast swab from bitten area, finger swabs, and a control sample of assailants were obtained for all STR loci using AmpflSTR Identifier kit.","PeriodicalId":346392,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18099/IJETV.V3I1.8797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bite mark evidence is often introduced as being close to DNA in terms of accuracy. Bite marks are generally found at the scene of violent crime murders, sexual assaults and are an extremely difficult process to collect the bite marks/saliva sample very lightly, otherwise, only victim profile will be generated. On examination of victim's right breast, a patterned injury was discovered and determined to be from adult male’s teeth. Evidence was collected by the forensic doctor according to established techniques including recovery of saliva from the bite mark area despite the body. DNA analysis by PCR using polymorphic STR markers revealed a DNA profile of mixed origin. With the advent of more sensitive typing methodologies, fingernails clipping for foreign DNA, as well as swabs collected from the area on the victim's body (kissed, licked, genital area, bitten area from breast and lips), are analyzed. In addition, finger swabs for nail scrapping in the case of digital penetration could also be collected from the suspect for DNA analysis, findings new repeats of DNA. Generally, Victim’s DNA profile, a genotype contribution from the perpetrator was identified as a minor component. Thus the DNA typing results from the bite mark correlated with the DNA typing results obtained from other biological trace evidence identified from the victim's genital samples. The bite mark and the DNA evidence were used to screen suspects and played an important role in obtaining resolution of this case. In this study DNA profiled from the breast swab from bitten area, finger swabs, and a control sample of assailants were obtained for all STR loci using AmpflSTR Identifier kit.
在一起涉及多名攻击者的性侵案件中,通过咬痕进行DNA鉴定
咬痕证据通常被认为在准确性方面接近DNA。咬痕一般出现在暴力犯罪、谋杀、性侵犯等案件的现场,很难轻易采集到咬痕/唾液样本,否则只能生成受害人的侧写。在检查受害者的右乳房时,发现了一个有图案的伤口,并确定是由成年男性的牙齿造成的。法医根据现有技术收集证据,包括从咬痕区域提取唾液。利用多态STR标记进行PCR分析,发现其DNA谱为混合起源。随着更敏感的分型方法的出现,对指甲剪取外来DNA以及从受害者身体部位(亲吻、舔舐、生殖器部位、乳房和嘴唇咬伤部位)收集的拭子进行了分析。此外,在数字渗透的情况下,也可以从嫌疑人身上收集指甲刮擦的手指拭子进行DNA分析,发现新的DNA重复。一般来说,受害者的DNA特征,来自犯罪者的基因型贡献被确定为次要成分。因此,咬痕的DNA分型结果与从受害者生殖器样本中鉴定的其他生物痕迹证据中获得的DNA分型结果相关联。咬痕和DNA证据被用来筛选犯罪嫌疑人,对此案的侦破起到了重要作用。在本研究中,使用AmpflSTR识别试剂盒从被咬区域的乳房拭子、手指拭子和攻击者的对照样本中获得了所有STR位点的DNA图谱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信