A contrast of the popularity and the interpretation of non-GAAP earning disclosures in different industries

IF 0.9 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Kang Cheng, Mohammad Tavakolifar, Barkat Ullah
{"title":"A contrast of the popularity and the interpretation of non-GAAP earning disclosures in different industries","authors":"Kang Cheng,&nbsp;Mohammad Tavakolifar,&nbsp;Barkat Ullah","doi":"10.1002/jcaf.22652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines non-GAAP disclosures in two selected industries, the consumer nondurable goods industry and the business services industry, to address the question of whether non-GAAP measures are applied and interpreted uniformly across industries, and more importantly, if the market reacts to non-GAAP disclosures similarly across different industries. Industry membership potentially has an impact on the usage and interpretation of non-GAAP disclosures; some industries issue their own policy trying to standardize the use of non-GAAP measures in their industry. However, industry effects on non-GAAP disclosures have not been thoroughly studied. This study fills in the gap. Using hand-collected non-GAAP measures disclosed in the 8-K reports from 308 firms in the selected two industries, this study finds that: (1) the use of non-GAAP measures is more popular than reported in previous studies, and non-GAAP measures are not limited to performance measures; (2) there is weak evidence of industry preference as to which non-GAAP measures are more popular in that industry; and (3) the market reacts differently to non-GAAP disclosures in different industries. Combining the empirical findings, this study documents industry effects and market reactions in the interpretation of non-GAAP disclosures. Considering that these effects have not been formally academically documented in previous studies, this study carries practical implications for investors and financial analysts.</p>","PeriodicalId":44561,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcaf.22652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines non-GAAP disclosures in two selected industries, the consumer nondurable goods industry and the business services industry, to address the question of whether non-GAAP measures are applied and interpreted uniformly across industries, and more importantly, if the market reacts to non-GAAP disclosures similarly across different industries. Industry membership potentially has an impact on the usage and interpretation of non-GAAP disclosures; some industries issue their own policy trying to standardize the use of non-GAAP measures in their industry. However, industry effects on non-GAAP disclosures have not been thoroughly studied. This study fills in the gap. Using hand-collected non-GAAP measures disclosed in the 8-K reports from 308 firms in the selected two industries, this study finds that: (1) the use of non-GAAP measures is more popular than reported in previous studies, and non-GAAP measures are not limited to performance measures; (2) there is weak evidence of industry preference as to which non-GAAP measures are more popular in that industry; and (3) the market reacts differently to non-GAAP disclosures in different industries. Combining the empirical findings, this study documents industry effects and market reactions in the interpretation of non-GAAP disclosures. Considering that these effects have not been formally academically documented in previous studies, this study carries practical implications for investors and financial analysts.

非美国通用会计准则盈利披露在不同行业的普及程度和解释对比
本研究考察了非耐用消费品行业和商业服务行业这两个选定行业的非美国通用会计准则披露情况,以探讨非美国通用会计准则在各行业的应用和解释是否一致,更重要的是,市场对不同行业的非美国通用会计准则披露的反应是否相似。行业成员资格可能会对非美国通用会计准则披露的使用和解释产生影响;一些行业会发布自己的政策,试图规范非美国通用会计准则在本行业的使用。然而,行业对非美国通用会计准则披露的影响尚未得到深入研究。本研究填补了这一空白。通过手工收集选定的两个行业中 308 家公司在 8-K 报告中披露的非公认会计原则计量数据,本研究发现(1) 与以往的研究报告相比,非公认会计原则衡量标准的使用更为普遍,而且非公认会计原则衡量标准并不局限于业绩衡量标准;(2) 关于哪些非公认会计原则衡量标准在行业中更受欢迎,行业偏好的证据不足;(3) 不同行业的市场对非公认会计原则披露的反应不同。结合实证研究结果,本研究记录了在解释非美国通用会计准则披露时的行业效应和市场反应。考虑到这些效应在以往的研究中没有正式的学术记录,本研究对投资者和金融分析师具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信