Adapting Theory: Limited Neural Resource, Attention and Risk Attitude

Qiqi Cheng
{"title":"Adapting Theory: Limited Neural Resource, Attention and Risk Attitude","authors":"Qiqi Cheng","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3116312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a new descriptive theory for decision making under risk, called adapting theory, which deals with how the brain will adapt the distribution of limited neural resources to encode subjective utility(SV) for efficient use in contexts. This distribution will affect the relative utilities between each payoff, finally determining the risk attitude. Therefore, the adaptation will determine the change in risk attitude. We propose that the adaptation of distribution can be divided into two dimensions, the degree of concentration (utility of a given value) and the location of concentration(attention) of neural resources. By introducing four assumptions on the distribution, this paper studies how those two dimensions vary accordingly in decision contexts, and finally determines risk attitude. By specifying these two parameters as a function of payoffs, our theory provides a novel and unified account of many empirical phenomena. Our theory also yields new predictions, including some that distinguish it from prospect theory and the salience theory. At the same time, our theory can be applied in more decision contexts than prospect theory. In addition, the implications of our theory may provide a useful insight for those decision theories based on the utility function.","PeriodicalId":218595,"journal":{"name":"ORG: Behavioral Economics & Organizational Behavior (Topic)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORG: Behavioral Economics & Organizational Behavior (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3116312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a new descriptive theory for decision making under risk, called adapting theory, which deals with how the brain will adapt the distribution of limited neural resources to encode subjective utility(SV) for efficient use in contexts. This distribution will affect the relative utilities between each payoff, finally determining the risk attitude. Therefore, the adaptation will determine the change in risk attitude. We propose that the adaptation of distribution can be divided into two dimensions, the degree of concentration (utility of a given value) and the location of concentration(attention) of neural resources. By introducing four assumptions on the distribution, this paper studies how those two dimensions vary accordingly in decision contexts, and finally determines risk attitude. By specifying these two parameters as a function of payoffs, our theory provides a novel and unified account of many empirical phenomena. Our theory also yields new predictions, including some that distinguish it from prospect theory and the salience theory. At the same time, our theory can be applied in more decision contexts than prospect theory. In addition, the implications of our theory may provide a useful insight for those decision theories based on the utility function.
适应理论:有限神经资源、注意与风险态度
本文提出了一种新的描述风险决策的理论,即适应理论,该理论研究大脑如何调整有限神经资源的分布,以编码主观效用(SV),以便在特定情境下有效使用。这种分布将影响各收益之间的相对效用,最终决定风险态度。因此,适应将决定风险态度的变化。我们提出神经资源的分布适应性可分为两个维度,即神经资源的集中程度(给定值的效用)和集中位置(注意力)。本文通过引入四个假设,研究这两个维度在决策情境下如何相应变化,最终确定风险态度。通过将这两个参数指定为收益的函数,我们的理论为许多经验现象提供了一种新颖而统一的解释。我们的理论也产生了新的预测,包括一些区别于前景理论和显著性理论的预测。同时,我们的理论可以应用于比前景理论更多的决策情境。此外,我们的理论的含义可能为那些基于效用函数的决策理论提供有用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书