Correlation of Conjunctival Impression Cytology and Clinical Examination in University Students at Lahore during the COVID-19

Muhammad Saaed Zafar Khan, Javaid Qazi, A. Aslam, Z. Kamal, Ummarah Rasheed
{"title":"Correlation of Conjunctival Impression Cytology and Clinical Examination in University Students at Lahore during the COVID-19","authors":"Muhammad Saaed Zafar Khan, Javaid Qazi, A. Aslam, Z. Kamal, Ummarah Rasheed","doi":"10.54692/lgujls.2022.0604231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During COVID 19 pandemic every home-bound school, college, and university student was using computers and electronic gadgets for social networking and online education. To assess the effects of these gadgets on ocular and vision-related problems, very little research had been done on the Pakistani population, especially among university students. An analytical cross-sectional study was carried out on 355 students of University of the Punjab. Questionnaire-based data were collected by measurement of tearfilm breakup time(TBUT), the number of corneal dry spots, Schirmer’s test, and conjunctival impression cytology(CIC). Pearson correlation analysis was done on CIC score versus TBUT, Schirmer’s test and Goblet Cell Density (GCD). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for mean comparison of visual acuity, TBUT, cornea spots, and Schirmer’s test to see the significance of the results. P-value≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Out ofthe 355 students, 65% were females. The mean age of the students was 22.30 ± 6.8 years. At each level of visual acuity, there was no statistically  significant difference between the meansof the different levels of visual acuity (F=0.488, p=0.614). A statistically significant meandifference was found between CIC score and TBUT (F=208.45p=<0.001), CIC score andcornea spot (F=39.31, p=<0.001), CIC score and Schirmer’s test (F=5.83, p=0.001). Forthe early diagnosis and management of CVS, in addition to applying the validated questionnaire and clinical dry eye tests, the Conjunctival impression cytology can be tested on a larger population to be proven as a gold slandered test.","PeriodicalId":148827,"journal":{"name":"Lahore Garrison University Journal of Life Sciences","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lahore Garrison University Journal of Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54692/lgujls.2022.0604231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During COVID 19 pandemic every home-bound school, college, and university student was using computers and electronic gadgets for social networking and online education. To assess the effects of these gadgets on ocular and vision-related problems, very little research had been done on the Pakistani population, especially among university students. An analytical cross-sectional study was carried out on 355 students of University of the Punjab. Questionnaire-based data were collected by measurement of tearfilm breakup time(TBUT), the number of corneal dry spots, Schirmer’s test, and conjunctival impression cytology(CIC). Pearson correlation analysis was done on CIC score versus TBUT, Schirmer’s test and Goblet Cell Density (GCD). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for mean comparison of visual acuity, TBUT, cornea spots, and Schirmer’s test to see the significance of the results. P-value≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Out ofthe 355 students, 65% were females. The mean age of the students was 22.30 ± 6.8 years. At each level of visual acuity, there was no statistically  significant difference between the meansof the different levels of visual acuity (F=0.488, p=0.614). A statistically significant meandifference was found between CIC score and TBUT (F=208.45p=<0.001), CIC score andcornea spot (F=39.31, p=<0.001), CIC score and Schirmer’s test (F=5.83, p=0.001). Forthe early diagnosis and management of CVS, in addition to applying the validated questionnaire and clinical dry eye tests, the Conjunctival impression cytology can be tested on a larger population to be proven as a gold slandered test.
新型冠状病毒肺炎期间拉合尔大学生结膜印象细胞学与临床检查的相关性
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,每个在家上学的学生都在使用电脑和电子设备进行社交网络和在线教育。为了评估这些设备对眼部和视力相关问题的影响,对巴基斯坦人口,特别是大学生进行的研究很少。对旁遮普大学的355名学生进行了分析性横断面研究。通过测量泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)、角膜干斑数量、Schirmer试验和结膜印象细胞学(CIC)收集问卷数据。对CIC评分与TBUT、Schirmer检验和Goblet细胞密度(GCD)进行Pearson相关分析。采用方差分析(ANOVA)对视力、TBUT、角膜色斑进行均值比较,并采用Schirmer检验检验结果的显著性。p值≤0.05认为有统计学意义。在355名学生中,65%是女性。学生平均年龄22.30±6.8岁。在各视力水平上,不同视力水平的平均值之间差异无统计学意义(F=0.488, p=0.614)。CIC评分与TBUT (F=208.45p=<0.001)、CIC评分与角膜光斑(F=39.31, p=<0.001)、CIC评分与Schirmer检验(F=5.83, p=0.001)的平均差异有统计学意义。对于CVS的早期诊断和管理,除了应用有效的问卷调查和临床干眼检查外,结膜印象细胞学可以在更大的人群中进行测试,以证明它是一种金诽谤测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信