Diagnostic Interval for Oldest-Old Patients with II–III Stage Right Colon Cancer

P. Tsarkov, V. M. Nekoval, I. Tulina, V. Balaban
{"title":"Diagnostic Interval for Oldest-Old Patients with II–III Stage Right Colon Cancer","authors":"P. Tsarkov, V. M. Nekoval, I. Tulina, V. Balaban","doi":"10.37586/2686-8636-2-2023-105-110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: the lack of comprehensive screening programs for colorectal cancer detection in oldest-old steadily leads to an increase in the diagnostic interval (DI), i.e. the time from the patient’s first presentation of complaints until diagnosis and treatment. At the same time, worsening the general somatic condition and developing the decompensation of concomitant diseases. Thus, patients with long-term DI need additional measures while preparing for surgery; the preoperative bed-day increases.Purpose of the study: to evaluate the impact of the diagnostic interval on the short-term results of II and III stages right colon cancer treatment in geriatric patients.Materials and methods: a retrospective multicenter study was conducted at the surgical facilities of Sechenov University from 2006 to 2015. The study included patients aged over 75 who have undergone surgical treatment of II and III stages right colon cancer. The control group comprised patients with CRC diagnosis in the period from 0 to 6 months; the studied group involved patients with a diagnostic interval over than 6 months.Results and conclusions. Analysis of the results revealed that patients older than 80 years had a longer diagnostic interval, which is statistically significant (p<0.001). Prolongation of the diagnostic interval for more than 6 months has shown a decrement in the polymorbidity indicators and operational and anesthetic risk compared with DI≤6 months (p=0.001, p=0.039). Polymorbidity, in particular cardiovascular diseases decompensation, affected the indicators of operational and anesthetic risk on the ASA scale, which were significantly higher in the study group (p=0.039). High level of polymorbidity required a longer preoperative preparation in the studied group, which is statistically significant in comparison with the control group (p=0.018). Statistically significant differences in early postoperative complications rate in both groups were not revealed. 30 and 90 day mortality rates were similar in the studied and control groups (p=0.225, p=0.353). The study has also shown that diagnostic interval (DI) have no effect on the prevalence of II and III stages comparing with the control group (p=0.315).","PeriodicalId":256357,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Geriatric Medicine","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37586/2686-8636-2-2023-105-110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: the lack of comprehensive screening programs for colorectal cancer detection in oldest-old steadily leads to an increase in the diagnostic interval (DI), i.e. the time from the patient’s first presentation of complaints until diagnosis and treatment. At the same time, worsening the general somatic condition and developing the decompensation of concomitant diseases. Thus, patients with long-term DI need additional measures while preparing for surgery; the preoperative bed-day increases.Purpose of the study: to evaluate the impact of the diagnostic interval on the short-term results of II and III stages right colon cancer treatment in geriatric patients.Materials and methods: a retrospective multicenter study was conducted at the surgical facilities of Sechenov University from 2006 to 2015. The study included patients aged over 75 who have undergone surgical treatment of II and III stages right colon cancer. The control group comprised patients with CRC diagnosis in the period from 0 to 6 months; the studied group involved patients with a diagnostic interval over than 6 months.Results and conclusions. Analysis of the results revealed that patients older than 80 years had a longer diagnostic interval, which is statistically significant (p<0.001). Prolongation of the diagnostic interval for more than 6 months has shown a decrement in the polymorbidity indicators and operational and anesthetic risk compared with DI≤6 months (p=0.001, p=0.039). Polymorbidity, in particular cardiovascular diseases decompensation, affected the indicators of operational and anesthetic risk on the ASA scale, which were significantly higher in the study group (p=0.039). High level of polymorbidity required a longer preoperative preparation in the studied group, which is statistically significant in comparison with the control group (p=0.018). Statistically significant differences in early postoperative complications rate in both groups were not revealed. 30 and 90 day mortality rates were similar in the studied and control groups (p=0.225, p=0.353). The study has also shown that diagnostic interval (DI) have no effect on the prevalence of II and III stages comparing with the control group (p=0.315).
老年II-III期右结肠癌患者的诊断间隔
引言:由于缺乏全面的高龄人群大肠癌筛查方案,导致诊断间隔(DI),即从患者首次出现主诉到诊断和治疗的时间不断增加。同时,使一般躯体状况恶化,并发疾病失代偿。因此,长期DI患者在准备手术时需要额外的措施;术前卧床时间增加。本研究目的:评价诊断间隔时间对老年患者ⅱ期和ⅲ期右结肠癌治疗短期疗效的影响。材料与方法:2006 - 2015年在谢切诺夫大学外科医院进行回顾性多中心研究。该研究包括75岁以上接受过II期和III期右结肠癌手术治疗的患者。对照组为0 ~ 6个月诊断为结直肠癌的患者;研究组包括诊断间隔超过6个月的患者。结果和结论。分析结果显示,80岁以上患者的诊断间隔较长,差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。与DI≤6个月相比,延长6个月以上的诊断间隔在多病指标、手术和麻醉风险方面有所降低(p=0.001, p=0.039)。多发病,特别是心血管疾病失代偿影响ASA评分的手术和麻醉风险指标,研究组的这两项指标明显高于对照组(p=0.039)。研究组多病发生率高,术前准备时间较对照组长,差异有统计学意义(p=0.018)。两组术后早期并发症发生率差异无统计学意义。研究组和对照组的30天和90天死亡率相似(p=0.225, p=0.353)。研究还表明,与对照组相比,诊断间隔(DI)对II期和III期的患病率没有影响(p=0.315)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信