Covid-19: Towards a New Notion of Crisis

C. Devroop, Connie Israel
{"title":"Covid-19: Towards a New Notion of Crisis","authors":"C. Devroop, Connie Israel","doi":"10.29086/2519-5476/2021/sp38a6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The momentum and the rapidity characterising the spread of COVID-19 will cause it to be a defining moment in our history, with the global community focus making us aware of its escalation almost simultaneously. We are a world in crisis. This paper explores the notions of crisis in our recent past and proposes a new 21 Century position notion of crisis. It comments on the inherited notion of crisis, which is a point where unprecedented action is called for or required. The notion of crisis was very strong throughout the 19 Century, where it was believed that the foundations of human life and society rest on critical crisis foundations (whether in economics, biology or linguistics). This thinking continued in the 20 Century, but the range of crisis expanded due to social expectations and the informed constituencies which emerged through the knowledge economy. Both these notions of crisis are explored in the first part of the paper. In the second part, we argue that, given the experience of the COVID-19 pandemic, there is room for a new (third) notion of crisis, one that is premised on the generation of expert (sic) constituencies which arise out of concerns or issues. Does this exacerbate the crisis, the notion of crisis and our understanding of it? Thus, while the 19th Century understanding of crisis was based on the fragility of the foundations on which civilization rests, and the 20 Century focus was on constituencies and the politics of rights, the 21 Century is around issues, such as COVID19. In this scenario, the relationship of the state, media and the public bear reference. New knowledge networks have arisen. Given the explosive COVID-19: Towards a New Notion of Crisis 117 dialectic which emerges when we are forced to acknowledge that perceptions of reality upon which we are reliant and which are established may prove to be fundamentally flawed when exposed to a crisis, the paper concludes that the pandemic has effectively dispelled certainty, and that we can only proceed with caution in crisis.","PeriodicalId":191534,"journal":{"name":"Alternation Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of the Aarts and Humanities in Southern Africa","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternation Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of the Aarts and Humanities in Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29086/2519-5476/2021/sp38a6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The momentum and the rapidity characterising the spread of COVID-19 will cause it to be a defining moment in our history, with the global community focus making us aware of its escalation almost simultaneously. We are a world in crisis. This paper explores the notions of crisis in our recent past and proposes a new 21 Century position notion of crisis. It comments on the inherited notion of crisis, which is a point where unprecedented action is called for or required. The notion of crisis was very strong throughout the 19 Century, where it was believed that the foundations of human life and society rest on critical crisis foundations (whether in economics, biology or linguistics). This thinking continued in the 20 Century, but the range of crisis expanded due to social expectations and the informed constituencies which emerged through the knowledge economy. Both these notions of crisis are explored in the first part of the paper. In the second part, we argue that, given the experience of the COVID-19 pandemic, there is room for a new (third) notion of crisis, one that is premised on the generation of expert (sic) constituencies which arise out of concerns or issues. Does this exacerbate the crisis, the notion of crisis and our understanding of it? Thus, while the 19th Century understanding of crisis was based on the fragility of the foundations on which civilization rests, and the 20 Century focus was on constituencies and the politics of rights, the 21 Century is around issues, such as COVID19. In this scenario, the relationship of the state, media and the public bear reference. New knowledge networks have arisen. Given the explosive COVID-19: Towards a New Notion of Crisis 117 dialectic which emerges when we are forced to acknowledge that perceptions of reality upon which we are reliant and which are established may prove to be fundamentally flawed when exposed to a crisis, the paper concludes that the pandemic has effectively dispelled certainty, and that we can only proceed with caution in crisis.
2019冠状病毒病:树立新的危机观念
COVID-19蔓延的势头和速度将使其成为我们历史上的一个决定性时刻,全球社会的关注使我们几乎同时意识到其升级。我们的世界正处于危机之中。本文对近代以来的危机观念进行了探讨,并提出了一种新的21世纪危机立场观。它评论了危机的继承概念,这是一个前所未有的行动被呼吁或需要的点。危机的概念在整个19世纪都非常强烈,人们认为人类生活和社会的基础建立在关键的危机基础上(无论是在经济学、生物学还是语言学上)。这种想法在20世纪仍在继续,但由于社会期望和知识经济中出现的知情选民,危机的范围扩大了。本文的第一部分对这两种危机概念进行了探讨。在第二部分中,我们认为,鉴于2019冠状病毒病大流行的经验,有空间提出一种新的(第三种)危机概念,其前提是产生由关切或问题产生的专家(sic)选区。这是否加剧了危机、危机的概念和我们对危机的理解?因此,虽然19世纪对危机的理解是基于文明赖以生存的基础的脆弱性,20世纪的重点是选区和权利政治,但21世纪的重点是像covid - 19这样的问题。在这种情况下,国家、媒体和公众之间的关系具有参考意义。新的知识网络已经出现。鉴于爆炸性的COVID-19:对危机的新概念117辩证法,当我们被迫承认我们所依赖的既定现实观念在面临危机时可能被证明存在根本缺陷时,就会出现辩证法,本文得出结论,大流行实际上消除了确定性,我们只能在危机中谨慎行事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信