Comparative analysis of stone aggregates for the manufacture of concrete in the construction of civil works

Wellington Leodan Velásquez Álava, Eduardo Humberto Ortiz Hernández, Ramona Panchana de Calderero
{"title":"Comparative analysis of stone aggregates for the manufacture of concrete in the construction of civil works","authors":"Wellington Leodan Velásquez Álava, Eduardo Humberto Ortiz Hernández, Ramona Panchana de Calderero","doi":"10.37957/rfd.v6i1.105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is a comparative analysis between aggregatesfrom the Picoazá - Megarok Basaltic quarry in Portoviejoand from the Ahon Mine in Quevedo, the purpose is toanalyze and characterize the stone aggregates from thePicoazá Basaltic quarry and from the Ahon Mine to designconcrete mixes and their impact on the performance forconstruction; an experimental methodology was applied.Samples were tested at the Soil Mechanics Laboratory ofthe Technical University of Manabi. Among the tests usedwere: angels machine, coarse granulometry, finegranulometry, specific weights, loose unit weights, unitweights, rodded unit weight, sulfate test, abrasion test, aswell as the preparation of specimens to be tested to simplecompression and to verify the resistances at ages of 7, 14,21, 21, 28 days. Obtaining differentiated results, it isconcluded that the aggregates of the Picoaza MegarokBasaltic quarry have greater resistance to compression inconcretes than the Ahon Mine that come from a riverbed,these resistance drops of approximately 15% with respect to the Picoaza quarry, are due to the content of siltmaterial present in the aggregate.","PeriodicalId":115293,"journal":{"name":"Revista Tecnológica Ciencia y Educación Edwards Deming","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Tecnológica Ciencia y Educación Edwards Deming","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37957/rfd.v6i1.105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research is a comparative analysis between aggregatesfrom the Picoazá - Megarok Basaltic quarry in Portoviejoand from the Ahon Mine in Quevedo, the purpose is toanalyze and characterize the stone aggregates from thePicoazá Basaltic quarry and from the Ahon Mine to designconcrete mixes and their impact on the performance forconstruction; an experimental methodology was applied.Samples were tested at the Soil Mechanics Laboratory ofthe Technical University of Manabi. Among the tests usedwere: angels machine, coarse granulometry, finegranulometry, specific weights, loose unit weights, unitweights, rodded unit weight, sulfate test, abrasion test, aswell as the preparation of specimens to be tested to simplecompression and to verify the resistances at ages of 7, 14,21, 21, 28 days. Obtaining differentiated results, it isconcluded that the aggregates of the Picoaza MegarokBasaltic quarry have greater resistance to compression inconcretes than the Ahon Mine that come from a riverbed,these resistance drops of approximately 15% with respect to the Picoaza quarry, are due to the content of siltmaterial present in the aggregate.
土建工程中制造混凝土用石料的对比分析
本研究是对来自portoviejop picoaz - Megarok玄武岩采石场和来自Quevedo的Ahon矿山的骨料进行比较分析,目的是分析和表征picoaz玄武岩采石场和Ahon矿山的石料,以设计混凝土配合比及其对施工性能的影响;采用实验方法。样品在马纳比技术大学的土壤力学实验室进行了测试。所采用的试验有:天使机、粗粒、细粒、比重、松散单位重、单位重、棒状单位重、硫酸盐试验、磨损试验,以及制备待测试样进行简单压缩,验证7、14、21、21、28天的阻力。获得不同的结果,得出的结论是,Picoaza megarok玄武岩采石场的骨料比来自河床的Ahon矿具有更大的抗压混凝土阻力,这些阻力相对于Picoaza采石场下降了约15%,这是由于骨料中存在粉质物质的含量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信