Buy-One-Get-One Promotions in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain

Yuefeng Li, M. Khouja, Jingming Pan, Jing Zhou
{"title":"Buy-One-Get-One Promotions in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain","authors":"Yuefeng Li, M. Khouja, Jingming Pan, Jing Zhou","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3561162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Buy-one-get-one (BOGO) promotions have become popular. With BOGO, the first unit is sold for the regular price, and the second unit is discounted. We analyze BOGO in manufacturer–retailer supply chains. We identify conditions under which BOGO outperforms price reduction (PR) and everyday low price (EDLP) policies. We find that, for some products, whether consumers stockpile or not, if BOGO and PR have the same market size, BOGO has a larger retailer profit and the same or larger manufacturer profit because BOGO induces more consumers to buy and consume two units. When consumers stockpile, the retailer sets prices to prevent such behavior, and the retailer’s share of supply chain profits is largest under BOGO, whereas consumer surplus with BOGO is smaller than PR. We also find that BOGO reduces double marginalization. When PR expands market size more than BOGO, BOGO’s effectiveness diminishes. When consumers stockpile without increasing consumption and/or production cost is high, EDLP is best. Our results are robust to multiperiod with single-promotion-period settings. A large number of regular-price periods following a promotion period increases stockpiling, which erodes the retailer’s profit and favors EDLP. If promotions are offered for consecutive periods, a larger number of promotion periods increases PR’s efficacy relative to BOGO. Time-inconsistent consumers increase stockpiling and make PR outperform BOGO. Heterogeneous consumers’ holding cost and marginal utility prevent retailers from perfectly discriminating among consumers who make profit-reducing choices. Compared with retailers’ BOGO, manufacturers’ BOGO increases double marginalization and decreases retailers’ and manufacturers’ profits and consumer surplus. This paper was accepted by Jayashankar Swaminathan, operations management. Funding: This work was partially supported by the National Science Foundation of China [Grants 71972026, 72101102]. Y. Li’s work was supported by the China Scholarship Council [Grant 201806070094]. Supplemental Material: The online companion and data are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4638 .","PeriodicalId":330843,"journal":{"name":"PROD: Analytical (Supply) (Topic)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROD: Analytical (Supply) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3561162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Buy-one-get-one (BOGO) promotions have become popular. With BOGO, the first unit is sold for the regular price, and the second unit is discounted. We analyze BOGO in manufacturer–retailer supply chains. We identify conditions under which BOGO outperforms price reduction (PR) and everyday low price (EDLP) policies. We find that, for some products, whether consumers stockpile or not, if BOGO and PR have the same market size, BOGO has a larger retailer profit and the same or larger manufacturer profit because BOGO induces more consumers to buy and consume two units. When consumers stockpile, the retailer sets prices to prevent such behavior, and the retailer’s share of supply chain profits is largest under BOGO, whereas consumer surplus with BOGO is smaller than PR. We also find that BOGO reduces double marginalization. When PR expands market size more than BOGO, BOGO’s effectiveness diminishes. When consumers stockpile without increasing consumption and/or production cost is high, EDLP is best. Our results are robust to multiperiod with single-promotion-period settings. A large number of regular-price periods following a promotion period increases stockpiling, which erodes the retailer’s profit and favors EDLP. If promotions are offered for consecutive periods, a larger number of promotion periods increases PR’s efficacy relative to BOGO. Time-inconsistent consumers increase stockpiling and make PR outperform BOGO. Heterogeneous consumers’ holding cost and marginal utility prevent retailers from perfectly discriminating among consumers who make profit-reducing choices. Compared with retailers’ BOGO, manufacturers’ BOGO increases double marginalization and decreases retailers’ and manufacturers’ profits and consumer surplus. This paper was accepted by Jayashankar Swaminathan, operations management. Funding: This work was partially supported by the National Science Foundation of China [Grants 71972026, 72101102]. Y. Li’s work was supported by the China Scholarship Council [Grant 201806070094]. Supplemental Material: The online companion and data are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4638 .
两级供应链中的买一送一促销
买一送一(BOGO)的促销活动已经流行起来。买一送一,第一个单位以正常价格出售,第二个单位打折。我们分析了制造商-零售商供应链中的买一送一现象。我们确定了BOGO优于降价(PR)和每日低价(EDLP)政策的条件。我们发现,对于某些产品,无论消费者是否有库存,如果BOGO和PR具有相同的市场规模,BOGO具有更大的零售商利润和相同或更大的制造商利润,因为BOGO诱导更多的消费者购买和消费两个单位。当消费者囤积商品时,零售商通过设定价格来防止这种行为的发生,在买一送一的情况下,零售商在供应链利润中所占的份额最大,而买一送一的消费者剩余小于PR。我们还发现,买一送一减少了双重边缘化。当PR比BOGO更能扩大市场规模时,BOGO的有效性就会降低。当消费者储存而不增加消费和/或生产成本高时,EDLP是最好的。我们的结果对具有单促销周期设置的多周期具有鲁棒性。促销期之后大量的正价期增加了库存,这侵蚀了零售商的利润,有利于EDLP。如果促销活动是连续的,那么相对于免费赠送,更多的促销活动可以提高PR的效果。时间不一致的消费者增加了库存,使得PR的表现优于买一送一。异质性消费者的持有成本和边际效用使零售商无法完全区分那些做出减少利润选择的消费者。与零售商的“买一送一”相比,制造商的“买一送一”增加了双重边缘化,降低了零售商和制造商的利润和消费者剩余。这篇论文被运营管理的Jayashankar Swaminathan接受。基金资助:国家自然科学基金资助项目[no . 71972026, 72101102]。李毅获中国国家留学基金委资助[201806070094]。补充材料:在线手册和数据可在https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4638上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信