Brain-to-Brain Interaction at a Distance: A Global or Differential Relationship?

W. Giroldini, Luciano Pederzoli, Marco Bilucaglia, E. Prati, Patrizio E. Tressoldi
{"title":"Brain-to-Brain Interaction at a Distance: A Global or Differential Relationship?","authors":"W. Giroldini, Luciano Pederzoli, Marco Bilucaglia, E. Prati, Patrizio E. Tressoldi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2991977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The main objective of this exploratory study was a confirmation of the results obtained by Giroldini et al, 2016, relative to the possibility of identifying a long-distance connection between the EEG activities of two totally sensory shielded subjects, one of whom was stimulated with light and sounds. Furthermore, this study sought to answer the following questions: - What is the relationship between the power of the EEG signal in the stimulated partner and that of the other distant partner? - Is the relationship between the EEG activities of the stimulated and distant isolated partners global (i.e., an undifferentiated response), or is it differentiated and thus displays variations depending on the characteristics of the stimulation applied to the stimulated pair? Methods: Five adults chosen for their experience in mind control techniques and their mutual friendships took part in this study. Each participant took turns in being both the stimulated partner and the isolated non-stimulated partner with each of the others, making a total of 20 pair combinations. The stimulated partner received three blocks of 32 visual-auditory stimulations lasting 1 second modulated at 10 Hz, 12 Hz, and 14 Hz respectively, with a constant inter-stimulus interval of 4 seconds. The EEG activity of each pair was recorded at 128 samples/sec over 14 channels and analyzed by measuring traditional steady-state potentials and the Pearson’s linear correlation between all possible signal pairs with an innovative algorithm. Results: From the results of the twenty pairs, we found an increase in the correlation among the EEG channels of the isolated distant partners, corresponding to frequencies of the steady-state visual and auditory potentials used for the stimulated partner. Furthermore, we did not find a correlation between the response intensity elicited in the stimulated partners and that observed in the non-stimulated one suggesting that this physical characteristic cannot be transferred between isolated partners. Discussion: A mental connection at distance can allow connection of informational rather than physical characteristics of the shared signals.","PeriodicalId":301526,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of Innovation eJournal","volume":"2 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of Innovation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2991977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The main objective of this exploratory study was a confirmation of the results obtained by Giroldini et al, 2016, relative to the possibility of identifying a long-distance connection between the EEG activities of two totally sensory shielded subjects, one of whom was stimulated with light and sounds. Furthermore, this study sought to answer the following questions: - What is the relationship between the power of the EEG signal in the stimulated partner and that of the other distant partner? - Is the relationship between the EEG activities of the stimulated and distant isolated partners global (i.e., an undifferentiated response), or is it differentiated and thus displays variations depending on the characteristics of the stimulation applied to the stimulated pair? Methods: Five adults chosen for their experience in mind control techniques and their mutual friendships took part in this study. Each participant took turns in being both the stimulated partner and the isolated non-stimulated partner with each of the others, making a total of 20 pair combinations. The stimulated partner received three blocks of 32 visual-auditory stimulations lasting 1 second modulated at 10 Hz, 12 Hz, and 14 Hz respectively, with a constant inter-stimulus interval of 4 seconds. The EEG activity of each pair was recorded at 128 samples/sec over 14 channels and analyzed by measuring traditional steady-state potentials and the Pearson’s linear correlation between all possible signal pairs with an innovative algorithm. Results: From the results of the twenty pairs, we found an increase in the correlation among the EEG channels of the isolated distant partners, corresponding to frequencies of the steady-state visual and auditory potentials used for the stimulated partner. Furthermore, we did not find a correlation between the response intensity elicited in the stimulated partners and that observed in the non-stimulated one suggesting that this physical characteristic cannot be transferred between isolated partners. Discussion: A mental connection at distance can allow connection of informational rather than physical characteristics of the shared signals.
远距离脑-脑互动:全球关系还是差异关系?
背景:本探索性研究的主要目的是确认Giroldini等人2016年获得的结果,即确定两个完全感官屏蔽的受试者的EEG活动之间存在远距离连接的可能性,其中一个受试者受到光和声音的刺激。此外,本研究试图回答以下问题:-受刺激的伴侣的脑电图信号功率与另一个远距离伴侣的脑电图信号功率之间的关系是什么?-受刺激者的脑电图活动与远距离孤立者的脑电图活动之间的关系是全局的(即,一种未分化的反应),还是有分化的,因此根据施加于受刺激者的刺激特征而表现出变化?方法:选择五名有精神控制经验的成年人和他们的共同友谊参与了这项研究。每个参与者轮流成为受刺激的伙伴和孤立的未受刺激的伙伴,总共有20对组合。受刺激的伴侣分别接受3组32次持续1秒的视觉-听觉刺激,分别以10 Hz、12 Hz和14 Hz调制,刺激间隔为4秒。在14个通道上以128个样本/秒的速度记录每对脑电图活动,并利用创新算法测量传统稳态电位和所有可能信号对之间的Pearson线性相关性进行分析。结果:从20对的结果来看,我们发现孤立的远距离伴侣的脑电图通道之间的相关性增加,对应于受刺激伴侣的稳态视觉和听觉电位的频率。此外,我们没有发现在受刺激的伙伴中引起的反应强度与在未受刺激的伙伴中观察到的反应强度之间存在相关性,这表明这种物理特征不能在孤立的伙伴之间转移。讨论:远距离的心理联系可以使共享信号的信息特征而不是物理特征联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信