Laura Estefanía, Andrea Santamaría, K. L. Bernal, Félix Antonio Gómez, M. Hernández
{"title":"How Do Education Professionals Understand Creativity? A Study of The Implicit Theories On Creativity In A Sample Of Educators","authors":"Laura Estefanía, Andrea Santamaría, K. L. Bernal, Félix Antonio Gómez, M. Hernández","doi":"10.17478/JEYSG.201429020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores implicit theories on creativity in a group of educators, and some associated myths and beliefs, such as: \"The school can do nothing to develop creativity\", \"childhood is the golden age of creativity\", and \"school kills creativity\". The sample was composed by educators graduated from the undergraduated program of Early Chile Education and the graduated students from the Masters Education of the School of Education at the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana of Bogota (Colombia). The analysis of the 110 answers, found that to define creativity, educators utilize the concepts of transformation, expertise, innovation, and problem solving. Most participants indicate that the most creative age is childhood, which confirms the \"golden age\" myth. Regarding the relation between creativity and schools, educators believe that schools can and must develop creativity, but they need specific conditions to achieve this. Based on these results it is important to stress the importance to develop pre-service and in-service teaching programs that allow educators to overcome these false beliefs and to understand how to foster creativity in educational settings.","PeriodicalId":207972,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Education of the Young Scientist and Giftedness","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Education of the Young Scientist and Giftedness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17478/JEYSG.201429020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
This study explores implicit theories on creativity in a group of educators, and some associated myths and beliefs, such as: "The school can do nothing to develop creativity", "childhood is the golden age of creativity", and "school kills creativity". The sample was composed by educators graduated from the undergraduated program of Early Chile Education and the graduated students from the Masters Education of the School of Education at the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana of Bogota (Colombia). The analysis of the 110 answers, found that to define creativity, educators utilize the concepts of transformation, expertise, innovation, and problem solving. Most participants indicate that the most creative age is childhood, which confirms the "golden age" myth. Regarding the relation between creativity and schools, educators believe that schools can and must develop creativity, but they need specific conditions to achieve this. Based on these results it is important to stress the importance to develop pre-service and in-service teaching programs that allow educators to overcome these false beliefs and to understand how to foster creativity in educational settings.
本研究探讨了一群教育工作者关于创造力的内隐理论,以及与之相关的一些神话和信念,如:“学校对培养创造力无能为力”、“童年是创造力的黄金时代”、“学校扼杀创造力”。样本由毕业于智利早期教育本科项目的教育工作者和毕业于波哥大(哥伦比亚)圣座大学(Pontificia Universidad Javeriana)教育学院的硕士研究生组成。对110个答案的分析发现,为了定义创造力,教育工作者利用了转型、专业知识、创新和解决问题的概念。大多数参与者表示,最有创造力的年龄是童年,这证实了“黄金时代”的神话。对于创造力与学校的关系,教育工作者认为学校能够而且必须培养创造力,但需要特定的条件来实现。基于这些结果,强调开发职前和在职教学计划的重要性是很重要的,这些计划可以让教育者克服这些错误的信念,并了解如何在教育环境中培养创造力。