D. Loeb
{"title":"The New Era of Open Access to Knowledge: Expansion to Under-Represented Disciplines","authors":"D. Loeb","doi":"10.4172/2375-4427.1000E107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Copyright: © 2013 Loeb DF. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. The feasibility and sustainability of Open Access (OA) journals and articles has been debated for over a decade [1-3]. Even with the ongoing debate, open access to scientific journal articles continues to gain momentum. Since 1993, open access journal articles have grown to account for 7.7% of all peer-reviewed published journal articles in 2009 [4] and 12% of all journal articles in 2012 [5]. Laakso and Bjork [6] comment, “It no longer seems to be a question whether OA is a viable alternative to the traditional subscription model for scholarly journal publishing; the question is rather when open access publishing will become the mainstream model.”","PeriodicalId":231062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders, Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication Disorders, Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4427.1000E107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
开放获取知识的新时代:向代表性不足的学科扩展
版权所有:©2013 Loeb DF。这是一篇根据知识共享署名许可协议发布的开放获取文章,该协议允许在任何媒体上不受限制地使用、分发和复制,前提是要注明原作者和来源。开放获取(OA)期刊和文章的可行性和可持续性已经争论了十多年[1-3]。尽管争论仍在继续,但开放获取科学期刊文章的势头仍在继续。自1993年以来,开放获取期刊文章在2009年占所有同行评议发表的期刊文章的7.7%[4],2012年占所有期刊文章的12%[5]。Laakso和Bjork[6]评论说:“对于学术期刊出版来说,开放获取是否能替代传统订阅模式已不再是一个问题;问题在于开放获取出版何时会成为主流模式。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。