Commutative Approximate Adders: Analysis and Evaluation

Junqi Huang, T. N. Kumar, Haider A. F. Almurib, F. Lombardi
{"title":"Commutative Approximate Adders: Analysis and Evaluation","authors":"Junqi Huang, T. N. Kumar, Haider A. F. Almurib, F. Lombardi","doi":"10.1109/NANOARCH53687.2021.9642233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ripple Carry Adders (RCAs) made of approximate cells are used in many applications to reduce power dissipation and delay. Unlike its exact counterpart, an approximate RCA may have a non-commutative feature due to the characteristics of the approximate cells. This paper analyses the commutative property of approximate RCAs. Initially, the Boolean equations and state diagram of approximate cells in the design of RCA are presented and conditions for an approximate cell to compute a non-commutative addition (NCA) are provided. The analysis shows that only a few approximate adders do not affect the commutative property. Then, an extensive analysis using images from a public library is performed by considering two-image addition. As expected, the non-commutative operation causes variations in the quality of output images; performance metrics such as PSNR, MED (Mean Error Distance) and MaxED (Maximum Error Distance) vary as the inputs are reversed. The results show that the absolute difference of PSNR, MED and MaxED (DPSNR, DMED, DMaxED) by reversing the inputs for non-commutative adders increases when the number of applied approximate cells increases. Among the non-commutative approximate adders, AMA3 has the lowest average DPSNR and DMaxED, 54% and 43% (to the maximum) of the highest one (AMA4). The average DMED for AMA4 is also the highest, so 9.23 and 2 times higher than AMA1 and AMA3 respectively.","PeriodicalId":424982,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Nanoscale Architectures (NANOARCH)","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Nanoscale Architectures (NANOARCH)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NANOARCH53687.2021.9642233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Ripple Carry Adders (RCAs) made of approximate cells are used in many applications to reduce power dissipation and delay. Unlike its exact counterpart, an approximate RCA may have a non-commutative feature due to the characteristics of the approximate cells. This paper analyses the commutative property of approximate RCAs. Initially, the Boolean equations and state diagram of approximate cells in the design of RCA are presented and conditions for an approximate cell to compute a non-commutative addition (NCA) are provided. The analysis shows that only a few approximate adders do not affect the commutative property. Then, an extensive analysis using images from a public library is performed by considering two-image addition. As expected, the non-commutative operation causes variations in the quality of output images; performance metrics such as PSNR, MED (Mean Error Distance) and MaxED (Maximum Error Distance) vary as the inputs are reversed. The results show that the absolute difference of PSNR, MED and MaxED (DPSNR, DMED, DMaxED) by reversing the inputs for non-commutative adders increases when the number of applied approximate cells increases. Among the non-commutative approximate adders, AMA3 has the lowest average DPSNR and DMaxED, 54% and 43% (to the maximum) of the highest one (AMA4). The average DMED for AMA4 is also the highest, so 9.23 and 2 times higher than AMA1 and AMA3 respectively.
交换近似加法器:分析与评价
由近似单元组成的纹波进位加法器(rca)在许多应用中用于降低功耗和延迟。与它的精确对应物不同,由于近似单元的特性,近似RCA可能具有非交换特性。本文分析了近似rca的交换性。首先给出了RCA设计中近似单元的布尔方程和状态图,并给出了近似单元计算非交换加法的条件。分析表明,只有少数近似加法器不影响交换性。然后,通过考虑双图像加法,使用公共图书馆的图像进行了广泛的分析。正如预期的那样,非交换运算导致输出图像质量的变化;性能指标,如PSNR, MED(平均误差距离)和max(最大误差距离)随着输入的反转而变化。结果表明,非交换加法器输入反转后的PSNR、MED和MaxED (DPSNR, DMED, DMaxED)的绝对差值随着近似单元的增加而增加。在非交换近似加法器中,AMA3的平均DPSNR和DMaxED最低,分别为最高加法器AMA4的54%和43%(最大)。AMA4的平均DMED也最高,分别是AMA1和AMA3的9.23倍和2倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信