Subjective Importance of Work and Time Allocation: Relationship with Subjective Well-Being and Work Engagement Under Different Job Demands

E. Rasskazova
{"title":"Subjective Importance of Work and Time Allocation: Relationship with Subjective Well-Being and Work Engagement Under Different Job Demands","authors":"E. Rasskazova","doi":"10.17759/cpp.2021290404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Investigating imbalance between the subjective importance of different life spheres and the time and energy devoted to them is a common task in counseling and psychotherapy. The aim of the study is to reveal the relationship between the the subjective importance of work and the time / effort devoted to it, with general well-being, work engagement and motivation under different levels of job demands. Procedure and methods. 286 students assessed the importance of five life spheres (work / study, family, personal life, friends, health) and the time and energy given to them, then filled Self-Regulation of Behavior Questionnaire, a modified version of the Action / State Orientation Questionnaire and Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. 1,200 people assessed spheres of life using the same approach, then filled Satisfaction With Life Scale, Scale for Positive And Negative Experiences, the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, a brief version of the Emotional Burnout Scale, the Workaholism Scale, Professional Motivation Questionnaire, Job Demands and Resources Questionnaire. Results and conclusions. Positive emotions, work engagement and intrinsic motivation are higher both in those reporting greater subjective importance of work, and in those reporting greater contribution of time and effort to this work (β=0,12-0,42, p<0,01). However, the time and energy devoted to work is less strongly associated with positive emotions, work engagement and intrinsic motivation under high and uncoordinated job demands (β=-0,14 — -0,09, p<0,05). Life satisfaction is higher, and negative emotions and emotional burnout at work are lower in those reporting higher importance of work, but this correlation is weaker for those who spend a lot of time and energy on work (β=-0,15 — -0,09, p<0,01). A greater contribution of effort and time to work, but not subjective importance of work, is also associated with workaholism (β=0,29, p<0,01).","PeriodicalId":387581,"journal":{"name":"Консультативная психология и психотерапия","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Консультативная психология и психотерапия","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2021290404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background. Investigating imbalance between the subjective importance of different life spheres and the time and energy devoted to them is a common task in counseling and psychotherapy. The aim of the study is to reveal the relationship between the the subjective importance of work and the time / effort devoted to it, with general well-being, work engagement and motivation under different levels of job demands. Procedure and methods. 286 students assessed the importance of five life spheres (work / study, family, personal life, friends, health) and the time and energy given to them, then filled Self-Regulation of Behavior Questionnaire, a modified version of the Action / State Orientation Questionnaire and Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. 1,200 people assessed spheres of life using the same approach, then filled Satisfaction With Life Scale, Scale for Positive And Negative Experiences, the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, a brief version of the Emotional Burnout Scale, the Workaholism Scale, Professional Motivation Questionnaire, Job Demands and Resources Questionnaire. Results and conclusions. Positive emotions, work engagement and intrinsic motivation are higher both in those reporting greater subjective importance of work, and in those reporting greater contribution of time and effort to this work (β=0,12-0,42, p<0,01). However, the time and energy devoted to work is less strongly associated with positive emotions, work engagement and intrinsic motivation under high and uncoordinated job demands (β=-0,14 — -0,09, p<0,05). Life satisfaction is higher, and negative emotions and emotional burnout at work are lower in those reporting higher importance of work, but this correlation is weaker for those who spend a lot of time and energy on work (β=-0,15 — -0,09, p<0,01). A greater contribution of effort and time to work, but not subjective importance of work, is also associated with workaholism (β=0,29, p<0,01).
工作的主观重要性和时间分配:不同工作需求下主观幸福感和工作投入的关系
背景。调查不同生活领域的主观重要性与投入时间和精力之间的不平衡是咨询和心理治疗中的一项共同任务。本研究的目的是揭示在不同的工作需求水平下,工作的主观重要性和投入的时间/精力与总体幸福感、工作投入和工作动机之间的关系。程序和方法。286名学生评估了五个生活领域(工作/学习、家庭、个人生活、朋友、健康)的重要性和给予他们的时间和精力,然后填写了行为自我调节问卷(行动/状态取向问卷和认知情绪调节问卷的修改版本),1200名学生使用相同的方法评估了生活领域,然后填写了生活满意度量表、积极和消极经历量表、乌得勒支工作投入量表、简略版情绪倦怠量表、工作狂量表、职业动机问卷、工作需求与资源问卷。结果和结论。积极情绪、工作投入和内在动机在工作主观重要性较高的员工和对工作投入时间和精力较多的员工中均较高(β=0,12-0,42, p< 0.01)。然而,在高和不协调的工作要求下,投入工作的时间和精力与积极情绪、工作投入和内在动机的相关性较弱(β=-0,14 - -0,09, p< 0.05)。对工作重视程度高的人,其生活满意度较高,工作中的负面情绪和情绪倦怠程度较低,但对工作花费大量时间和精力的人来说,这种相关性较弱(β=-0,15 - -0,09, p< 0.01)。对工作投入更多的精力和时间,而不是主观的工作重要性,也与工作狂有关(β=0,29, p< 0.01)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信