A View from the Top: Library Leaders’ Predictions for the Future of Science Liaison Librarianship

L. Palumbo, Jeffra D. Bussmann, Barbara Kern
{"title":"A View from the Top: Library Leaders’ Predictions for the Future of Science Liaison Librarianship","authors":"L. Palumbo, Jeffra D. Bussmann, Barbara Kern","doi":"10.5860/llm.v36i1.7511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Library leaders at academic institutions in the United States at the level of University Librarians, Library Directors, and Library Deans were surveyed about their predictions for the future of science liaison librarianship and the importance of science subject specialization. Responses from 71 library leaders at institutions ranging from community colleges through large, research intensive universities provide insight into evolving roles for academic science librarians. Key findings include that library leaders perceive functional roles such as data management and scholarly communication growing in importance, yet they are rarely seen as replacing traditional subject-based ones. Subject specialization is still seen by many as a desirable qualification for science librarians, even though smaller institutional size and budget constraints may necessitate a more generalist approach. While there was no consensus on the necessity of science subject specialization, and whether or not science liaison librarianship would retain this characteristic in the future, there was a widespread acknowledgement of the value of liaison relationships with science faculty and others at their institutions.","PeriodicalId":404822,"journal":{"name":"Library Leadership & Management","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library Leadership & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/llm.v36i1.7511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Library leaders at academic institutions in the United States at the level of University Librarians, Library Directors, and Library Deans were surveyed about their predictions for the future of science liaison librarianship and the importance of science subject specialization. Responses from 71 library leaders at institutions ranging from community colleges through large, research intensive universities provide insight into evolving roles for academic science librarians. Key findings include that library leaders perceive functional roles such as data management and scholarly communication growing in importance, yet they are rarely seen as replacing traditional subject-based ones. Subject specialization is still seen by many as a desirable qualification for science librarians, even though smaller institutional size and budget constraints may necessitate a more generalist approach. While there was no consensus on the necessity of science subject specialization, and whether or not science liaison librarianship would retain this characteristic in the future, there was a widespread acknowledgement of the value of liaison relationships with science faculty and others at their institutions.
从高处看:图书馆领导对未来科学联络图书馆关系的预测
对美国学术机构的大学图书馆员、图书馆馆长和图书馆院长等级别的图书馆领导进行了调查,询问他们对未来科学联络图书馆关系的预测以及科学学科专业化的重要性。从社区学院到大型研究型大学等机构的71位图书馆负责人的回答,为学术科学图书馆员的角色演变提供了见解。主要发现包括,图书馆领导认为数据管理和学术交流等功能性角色越来越重要,但它们很少被视为取代传统的以学科为基础的角色。学科专业化仍然被许多人视为科学图书馆员的理想资格,即使较小的机构规模和预算限制可能需要更全面的方法。虽然对于科学学科专业化的必要性以及科学联络图书馆在未来是否会保留这一特点没有达成共识,但人们普遍认识到与科学教师及其所在机构的其他人建立联络关系的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信