Annual Appropriation as Instrument of Good Governance and Effective Public Goals’ Actualisation : An Evaluation of Public Policing in Nigeria 2011 - 2018

Nwobi , Fedelia Obuteaku
{"title":"Annual Appropriation as Instrument of Good Governance and Effective Public Goals’ Actualisation : An Evaluation of Public Policing in Nigeria 2011 - 2018","authors":"Nwobi , Fedelia Obuteaku","doi":"10.12816/0052760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Annual Appropriation has been the instrument employed by the three tiers of government in Nigeria to mobilise, allocate, and manage resources towards the satisfaction of public needs and monitored through legislative oversight functions. This paper explored the relationship between budgeting and the delivery of good governance with a focus on Nigerian Police Force (NPF), 2011 to 2018.It is the responsibility of NPF to detect and prevent crimes, apprehend and prosecute offender, preserve law and order, protect life and property, and perform other functions as may be required of them by any Act. Empirical evidences reveal that in spite of increasing appropriation of fund to NPF, the Force has failed in its responsibilities. Dominant opinion in the literature tends to support under-funding and corruption as the cause of this failure. However, there is little or no assessment of NPF adherence to conventional budgetary processes, and its impact on the provision of good governance. Generally, this paper seeks to engage in these assessments. It adopted documentary research and content analysis wherein published and unpublished books, journals, conference and workshop papers, government and civil society documents found in Libraries and the internet were explored. The results of the analysis reveal that there is no relationship between the level of annual appropriation and NPF abysmal failure in its responsibilities. It also reveals that NPF does not practice conventional budgetary principles, which would have factored in their justifiable units’ needs; the politicisation and use of the force by dominant ruling elites has negative impact on the image of the force and the approval of their budget proposals; NPF abandoned its conventional responsibilities for private and individual policing; and the unambiguous pursuit of individual economic interest of members of the force turned members of the public into preys. The paper recommends among others: NPF adoption of international budgeting best practices, the establishment of budget and planning department in all NPF Commands, introduction of compulsory budget seminars/workshops, and the establishment of police Special anti-abuse and ethics department to deal with deviants in the Force ranks and files.","PeriodicalId":266840,"journal":{"name":"NG-Journal of Social Development","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NG-Journal of Social Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12816/0052760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Annual Appropriation has been the instrument employed by the three tiers of government in Nigeria to mobilise, allocate, and manage resources towards the satisfaction of public needs and monitored through legislative oversight functions. This paper explored the relationship between budgeting and the delivery of good governance with a focus on Nigerian Police Force (NPF), 2011 to 2018.It is the responsibility of NPF to detect and prevent crimes, apprehend and prosecute offender, preserve law and order, protect life and property, and perform other functions as may be required of them by any Act. Empirical evidences reveal that in spite of increasing appropriation of fund to NPF, the Force has failed in its responsibilities. Dominant opinion in the literature tends to support under-funding and corruption as the cause of this failure. However, there is little or no assessment of NPF adherence to conventional budgetary processes, and its impact on the provision of good governance. Generally, this paper seeks to engage in these assessments. It adopted documentary research and content analysis wherein published and unpublished books, journals, conference and workshop papers, government and civil society documents found in Libraries and the internet were explored. The results of the analysis reveal that there is no relationship between the level of annual appropriation and NPF abysmal failure in its responsibilities. It also reveals that NPF does not practice conventional budgetary principles, which would have factored in their justifiable units’ needs; the politicisation and use of the force by dominant ruling elites has negative impact on the image of the force and the approval of their budget proposals; NPF abandoned its conventional responsibilities for private and individual policing; and the unambiguous pursuit of individual economic interest of members of the force turned members of the public into preys. The paper recommends among others: NPF adoption of international budgeting best practices, the establishment of budget and planning department in all NPF Commands, introduction of compulsory budget seminars/workshops, and the establishment of police Special anti-abuse and ethics department to deal with deviants in the Force ranks and files.
年度拨款作为善治和有效实现公共目标的工具:2011 - 2018年尼日利亚公共警务评估
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信