Control approaches of current-source rectifier: Predictive control versus PWM-based linear control

J. Michalik, V. Šmídl, Z. Peroutka
{"title":"Control approaches of current-source rectifier: Predictive control versus PWM-based linear control","authors":"J. Michalik, V. Šmídl, Z. Peroutka","doi":"10.1109/PEDS.2017.8289263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, finite control set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) is very popular because it is effective, simple and suitable for control of various types of power converters. It is also a flexible tool because it evaluates an arbitrary cost function which directly influences converter behavior according to particular demand (i.e. shape of the current, switching frequency, switching losses etc.). However, some drawbacks of FCS-MPC, such as variable switching frequency or steady-state error, have also been reported. The limitation is also in the fact that efficient calculation is available only for very short prediction horizon (mostly one-step-ahead), otherwise the computational demand increases significantly. In this paper, we present a comparison and evaluation of the FCS-MPC improved with an approximation by an LQR (which enables an extension to long prediction horizons) and a widely used control with PI controller with space vector modulation (SVM). The comparison is performed on current-source rectifier (CSR) in terms of output current tracking quality, input current THD and switching frequency. Final results will be introduced by simulation study in MATLAB/Plecs and laboratory experiments.","PeriodicalId":411916,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 12th International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems (PEDS)","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 12th International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems (PEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PEDS.2017.8289263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Nowadays, finite control set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) is very popular because it is effective, simple and suitable for control of various types of power converters. It is also a flexible tool because it evaluates an arbitrary cost function which directly influences converter behavior according to particular demand (i.e. shape of the current, switching frequency, switching losses etc.). However, some drawbacks of FCS-MPC, such as variable switching frequency or steady-state error, have also been reported. The limitation is also in the fact that efficient calculation is available only for very short prediction horizon (mostly one-step-ahead), otherwise the computational demand increases significantly. In this paper, we present a comparison and evaluation of the FCS-MPC improved with an approximation by an LQR (which enables an extension to long prediction horizons) and a widely used control with PI controller with space vector modulation (SVM). The comparison is performed on current-source rectifier (CSR) in terms of output current tracking quality, input current THD and switching frequency. Final results will be introduced by simulation study in MATLAB/Plecs and laboratory experiments.
电流源整流器的控制方法:预测控制与基于pwm的线性控制
目前,有限控制集模型预测控制(FCS-MPC)因其有效、简单、适用于各种类型的电源变换器的控制而受到广泛的应用。它也是一种灵活的工具,因为它根据特定需求(即电流形状,开关频率,开关损耗等)评估直接影响转换器行为的任意成本函数。然而,FCS-MPC的一些缺点,如开关频率可变或稳态误差,也被报道。其局限性还在于,有效的计算只能用于非常短的预测范围(主要是提前一步),否则计算需求将显著增加。在本文中,我们提出了一个比较和评价的FCS-MPC改进了一个近似的LQR(它可以扩展到较长的预测范围)和广泛使用的PI控制器与空间矢量调制(SVM)的控制。对电流源整流器(CSR)的输出电流跟踪质量、输入电流THD和开关频率进行了比较。最后将通过MATLAB/Plecs仿真研究和实验室实验介绍最终结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信