Non-formal education: The review of current studies

M. Kicherova, I. Trifonova
{"title":"Non-formal education: The review of current studies","authors":"M. Kicherova, I. Trifonova","doi":"10.17853/1994-5639-2023-2-46-67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Non-formal education is gaining a new impetus in the establishment of a sustainable knowledge society. The article reveals major concerns of non-formal education as an element of life-long learning and adult education policies as well as its effective implementation into the national educational mainstream.Aim. The aim of the research is to conduct a detailed overview of various current studies, exemplifying the international experience in non-formal education and the case-studies of its adoption along with the mechanisms for its validation in different countries.Methodology and research methods. The work was based on the methodology of comparative analysis and qualitative content analysis of official UNESCO, CEDEFOP, etc. international statistical and analytical reports, academic and empirical studies. An analytical review shows policy changes towards the development of non-formal education as well as an international and available in individual countries experience of its studying and implementation.Results. Based on the compatibility scopes principle, three levels of analysis of non-formal education (macro-level/global, meso-level/institutional, micro-level/personal) were identified so that the key issues and trends in its development could be pinpointed at every stage. The conducted research leads to the conclusion that non-formal education practices are acquiring institutional forms. The level of non-formal education development in different countries varies. However, there are general trends towards solving a number of similar social problems by means of non-formal education, such as bridging the supply and demand for competencies in the labour market, social inclusion of different segments of the population, and others.Scientific novelty and practical significance. The novelty of this study is seen in the resource capacity of non-formal education, the potential of its implementation for the vocational re-skilling, upskilling and further training of various socio-demographic groups, its global development trends and prospects. The practical significance lies in the application of mechanisms for recognising non-formal education outcomes. The highlighted trends and the best international experience can provide non-formal education integration into the educational mainstream, create experimental learning platforms and accelerate practical educational policy measures. ","PeriodicalId":278157,"journal":{"name":"The Education and science journal","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Education and science journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2023-2-46-67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Non-formal education is gaining a new impetus in the establishment of a sustainable knowledge society. The article reveals major concerns of non-formal education as an element of life-long learning and adult education policies as well as its effective implementation into the national educational mainstream.Aim. The aim of the research is to conduct a detailed overview of various current studies, exemplifying the international experience in non-formal education and the case-studies of its adoption along with the mechanisms for its validation in different countries.Methodology and research methods. The work was based on the methodology of comparative analysis and qualitative content analysis of official UNESCO, CEDEFOP, etc. international statistical and analytical reports, academic and empirical studies. An analytical review shows policy changes towards the development of non-formal education as well as an international and available in individual countries experience of its studying and implementation.Results. Based on the compatibility scopes principle, three levels of analysis of non-formal education (macro-level/global, meso-level/institutional, micro-level/personal) were identified so that the key issues and trends in its development could be pinpointed at every stage. The conducted research leads to the conclusion that non-formal education practices are acquiring institutional forms. The level of non-formal education development in different countries varies. However, there are general trends towards solving a number of similar social problems by means of non-formal education, such as bridging the supply and demand for competencies in the labour market, social inclusion of different segments of the population, and others.Scientific novelty and practical significance. The novelty of this study is seen in the resource capacity of non-formal education, the potential of its implementation for the vocational re-skilling, upskilling and further training of various socio-demographic groups, its global development trends and prospects. The practical significance lies in the application of mechanisms for recognising non-formal education outcomes. The highlighted trends and the best international experience can provide non-formal education integration into the educational mainstream, create experimental learning platforms and accelerate practical educational policy measures. 
非正规教育:当前研究综述
介绍。非正规教育在建立可持续的知识社会中获得了新的动力。本文揭示了作为终身学习和成人教育政策组成部分的非正规教育的主要问题,以及非正规教育在国家教育主流中的有效实施。这项研究的目的是对目前的各种研究进行详细的概述,举例说明非正规教育的国际经验和采用非正规教育的案例研究,以及在不同国家验证非正规教育的机制。方法论和研究方法。这项工作是根据教科文组织、青年发展计划等官方国际统计和分析报告、学术和实证研究的比较分析和定性内容分析方法进行的。一项分析性审查显示了发展非正规教育的政策变化,以及国际和个别国家在其研究和实施方面的经验。基于兼容范围原则,对非正规教育进行了宏观层面/全球层面、中观层面/机构层面、微观层面/个人层面的三个层次的分析,以便在每个阶段都能准确定位其发展的关键问题和趋势。研究结果表明,非正规教育实践正在获得制度形式。各国非正规教育的发展水平各不相同。但是,一般的趋势是通过非正规教育解决一些类似的社会问题,例如弥合劳动力市场能力的供求关系、不同人口阶层的社会包容等等。具有科学新颖性和现实意义。这项研究的新颖之处在于非正规教育的资源能力、实施非正规教育对各种社会人口群体的职业再技能、提高技能和进一步培训的潜力、其全球发展趋势和前景。其现实意义在于非正规教育成果认可机制的应用。突出的趋势和国际最佳经验可以为非正规教育融入教育主流,创造实验性学习平台,加速实施教育政策措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信