KEABSAHAN PERJANJIAN PINJAM NAMA ANTARA WARGA NEGARA ASING TERHADAP WARGA NEGARA INDONESIA

Oriza Imanda Pratama Ismi Putri, Fatma Ulfatun Najicha
{"title":"KEABSAHAN PERJANJIAN PINJAM NAMA ANTARA WARGA NEGARA ASING TERHADAP WARGA NEGARA INDONESIA","authors":"Oriza Imanda Pratama Ismi Putri, Fatma Ulfatun Najicha","doi":"10.31933/unesrev.v4i2.222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the legal provisions in the regulations regarding the nominee agreement and the form of sanctions given to the notary making the nominee agreement deed that is contrary to the UUPA. This type of research is normative juridical and the approach method used is the statutory approach. The results of this study are that the nominee  agreement between foreign citizen and Indonesian citizen does not meet the objective requirements for the validity of the agreement, because it does not contain a lawful cause. This is because this agreement was made to do things that are prohibited by law. Foreign nationals do not have ownership rights to land in Indonesia, but only have usufructuary rights to land. This has been regulated in Article 42 of the UUPA. In relation to the notary making the deed of the nominee agreement which is contrary to the UUPA, then administratively, the notary has violated article 16 paragraph (1) letter d of the UUJN, so that it can be subject to sanctions in the form of verbal warning, written warning, temporary dismissal, respectful dismissal, or dishonorable dismissal.","PeriodicalId":193737,"journal":{"name":"UNES Law Review","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNES Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v4i2.222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal provisions in the regulations regarding the nominee agreement and the form of sanctions given to the notary making the nominee agreement deed that is contrary to the UUPA. This type of research is normative juridical and the approach method used is the statutory approach. The results of this study are that the nominee  agreement between foreign citizen and Indonesian citizen does not meet the objective requirements for the validity of the agreement, because it does not contain a lawful cause. This is because this agreement was made to do things that are prohibited by law. Foreign nationals do not have ownership rights to land in Indonesia, but only have usufructuary rights to land. This has been regulated in Article 42 of the UUPA. In relation to the notary making the deed of the nominee agreement which is contrary to the UUPA, then administratively, the notary has violated article 16 paragraph (1) letter d of the UUJN, so that it can be subject to sanctions in the form of verbal warning, written warning, temporary dismissal, respectful dismissal, or dishonorable dismissal.
外国公民与印尼公民之间名字借据协议的合法性
本研究旨在分析法规中关于代持协议的法律规定,以及对出具违反UUPA的代持协议契据的公证员的制裁形式。这种类型的研究是规范的司法和使用的方法方法是法定的方法。本研究的结果是,外国公民与印尼公民之间的代名协议不符合协议有效性的客观要求,因为它不包含合法的原因。这是因为这个协议是为了做法律禁止的事情。外国人在印尼没有土地所有权,而只有土地的用益物权。这在UUPA第42条中有规定。在行政上,公证员违反《联合章程》第16条第(1)款d项,违反《联合章程》第16条第(1)项的规定,可以给予口头警告、书面警告、临时解雇、尊重解雇或开除等处分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信