Bond Strength of Machinable Ceramic Using Conventional Silane and Multipurpose Primer.

Khaled Naeim, A. Attia, M. Ellayeh
{"title":"Bond Strength of Machinable Ceramic Using Conventional Silane and Multipurpose Primer.","authors":"Khaled Naeim, A. Attia, M. Ellayeh","doi":"10.21608/mjd.2021.199968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To evaluate the bond strength to machinable glass ceramic using conventional silane and multipurpose primer after different surface treatments to composite build up. Materials and methods: A total of 64 lithium disilicateIPS e.max CADceramicspecimens with dimension(12X10X3) were fabricated using milling technology, thespecimens were equally divided into 4 main groups (n=16) according to the method of surface treatment as follows. In Group I: polished, Group II: Acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) application, Group III: Hydrofluoric acid (HF) application, Group IV:Monobond Etch & Prime (MEP) application. Each main group was further equally subdivided into 2 subgroups (n=8) according to methods of chemical bonding. Subgroup (A):Conventional silane.Subgroup (B):Multipurpose primer.Composite resin cylinder (Master fill) were fabricated and cemented to the treated specimens by multistep adhesive resin cement. All bonded specimens were stored in water bath for 5 months and subjected to 10000 thermal cycles. Shear bond strength (SBS) test was performed afterwards. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) was used for specimens examination .Results: The statistical analysis were done using two-way ANOVA and serial one-way ANOVAs followed by Post Hoc Tukey-HSD test at α =(0.05). Application of multipurpose primersignificantly increased SBS (P=0.001). The highest SBS mean value (14.8 ± 2.2 MPa) was obtained for APF followed by Monobond Etch & Prime with conventional silane (14.7 ± 2.8 MPa)On the other hand,APF with conventional silane showed the lowest SBS mean value(4.6 ± 2.0MPa). There was statistically significant difference between polished and APF considering conventional silane and multipurpose primer, and no statistically significant difference was reported between HF and Etch & Prim for conventional silane and multipurpose primer. Conclusions: Multipurpose primershowed superior bond strength in comparison to conventional silanewhen used for conditioning of lithium disilicateIPS e.max CADceramics.","PeriodicalId":308616,"journal":{"name":"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjd.2021.199968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the bond strength to machinable glass ceramic using conventional silane and multipurpose primer after different surface treatments to composite build up. Materials and methods: A total of 64 lithium disilicateIPS e.max CADceramicspecimens with dimension(12X10X3) were fabricated using milling technology, thespecimens were equally divided into 4 main groups (n=16) according to the method of surface treatment as follows. In Group I: polished, Group II: Acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) application, Group III: Hydrofluoric acid (HF) application, Group IV:Monobond Etch & Prime (MEP) application. Each main group was further equally subdivided into 2 subgroups (n=8) according to methods of chemical bonding. Subgroup (A):Conventional silane.Subgroup (B):Multipurpose primer.Composite resin cylinder (Master fill) were fabricated and cemented to the treated specimens by multistep adhesive resin cement. All bonded specimens were stored in water bath for 5 months and subjected to 10000 thermal cycles. Shear bond strength (SBS) test was performed afterwards. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) was used for specimens examination .Results: The statistical analysis were done using two-way ANOVA and serial one-way ANOVAs followed by Post Hoc Tukey-HSD test at α =(0.05). Application of multipurpose primersignificantly increased SBS (P=0.001). The highest SBS mean value (14.8 ± 2.2 MPa) was obtained for APF followed by Monobond Etch & Prime with conventional silane (14.7 ± 2.8 MPa)On the other hand,APF with conventional silane showed the lowest SBS mean value(4.6 ± 2.0MPa). There was statistically significant difference between polished and APF considering conventional silane and multipurpose primer, and no statistically significant difference was reported between HF and Etch & Prim for conventional silane and multipurpose primer. Conclusions: Multipurpose primershowed superior bond strength in comparison to conventional silanewhen used for conditioning of lithium disilicateIPS e.max CADceramics.
传统硅烷与多用途底漆对可切削陶瓷粘结强度的影响。
目的:评价传统硅烷和多用途底漆在不同表面处理后与可加工玻璃陶瓷的结合强度。材料与方法:采用铣削工艺制备尺寸为(12X10X3)的双硅酸锂eips e.max陶瓷试样64个,按表面处理方法分为4组(n=16)。第一组:抛光,第二组:酸化氟化磷酸(APF)应用,第三组:氢氟酸(HF)应用,第四组:单键蚀刻和Prime (MEP)应用。每一主组再按化学键法平均细分为2个亚组(n=8)。亚基(A):常规硅烷。亚组(B):多用途引物。制备复合树脂圆柱体(主填料),通过多级胶结树脂胶结与处理后的试件进行胶结。所有粘结试样在水浴中保存5个月,并经历10000次热循环。随后进行剪切粘结强度(SBS)试验。结果:统计学分析采用双因素方差分析(two-way ANOVA)和连续单因素方差分析(serial one-way ANOVA),并进行Post Hoc Tukey-HSD检验,α =(0.05)。多用途引物的应用显著提高了SBS (P=0.001)。APF的SBS平均值最高(14.8±2.2 MPa),其次是传统硅烷的Monobond Etch & Prime(14.7±2.8 MPa),而传统硅烷的APF的SBS平均值最低(4.6±2.0MPa)。考虑传统硅烷和多用途底漆,抛光和APF之间的差异有统计学意义,而传统硅烷和多用途底漆的HF和Etch & Prim之间的差异无统计学意义。结论:与传统硅烷相比,多用途处理剂在处理二硅酸锂eps e.max cad陶瓷时表现出更好的结合强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信