Constituent Order in German Multiple Questions: Normal Order and (Apparent) Anti-Superiority Effects

G. Fanselow, J. Haeussler, Thomas Weskott
{"title":"Constituent Order in German Multiple Questions: Normal Order and (Apparent) Anti-Superiority Effects","authors":"G. Fanselow, J. Haeussler, Thomas Weskott","doi":"10.1515/9783110401929-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many languages of the world, in particular those with a clause-final positioning of the verb, the order of the constituents of a clause is fairly free. Nevertheless, clauses have an “unmarked” or “normal” arrangement of their constituents in most of these free constituent order languages – polysynthetic languages such as Mohawk are a notable exception (Baker, 1996). The present paper is concerned with the factors that determine whether a given constituent order is unmarked or not. In particular, we report a series of judgment experiments concerned with constituent order preferences in German multiple questions. Their results show that multiple questions are a further, hitherto unknown, argument for the claim that normal order is not just determined by (semantic) role but also by cast: normal word order for wh-phrases differs from normal word order in simple declaratives. We will offer an attempt of an explanation for this difference in terms of a hierarchy of Case assigning heads in the final section of the paper. LE-Proceedings","PeriodicalId":293042,"journal":{"name":"The Mind Research Repository","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Mind Research Repository","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110401929-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In many languages of the world, in particular those with a clause-final positioning of the verb, the order of the constituents of a clause is fairly free. Nevertheless, clauses have an “unmarked” or “normal” arrangement of their constituents in most of these free constituent order languages – polysynthetic languages such as Mohawk are a notable exception (Baker, 1996). The present paper is concerned with the factors that determine whether a given constituent order is unmarked or not. In particular, we report a series of judgment experiments concerned with constituent order preferences in German multiple questions. Their results show that multiple questions are a further, hitherto unknown, argument for the claim that normal order is not just determined by (semantic) role but also by cast: normal word order for wh-phrases differs from normal word order in simple declaratives. We will offer an attempt of an explanation for this difference in terms of a hierarchy of Case assigning heads in the final section of the paper. LE-Proceedings
德国多元问题中的构成秩序:正常秩序与(明显的)反优势效应
在世界上的许多语言中,特别是那些将动词置于分句结尾的语言中,分句成分的顺序是相当自由的。然而,在大多数这些自由成分顺序语言中,分句的成分排列都是“未标记的”或“正常的”——莫霍克语等多合成语言是一个明显的例外(Baker, 1996)。本文关注的是决定一个给定的成分顺序是否未标记的因素。特别地,我们报告了一系列关于成分顺序偏好的判断实验。他们的研究结果表明,多重问题是对正常语序不仅由(语义)角色决定而且由类型决定这一说法的进一步的、迄今为止未知的论证:wh短语的正常语序不同于简单陈述句的正常语序。在本文的最后一节,我们将尝试根据案件分配人头的层次结构来解释这种差异。LE-Proceedings
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信