{"title":"Language assessment frameworks as language policy","authors":"Saskia Van Viegen, E. Jang","doi":"10.1558/jmtp.20395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewing the development and implementation of the Steps to English Proficiency (STEP) language proficiency assessment framework in Ontario, Canada, this article calls attention to how language proficiency is operationalised in English language proficiency (ELP) standards in ways that may institutionalise hierarchies among home, school and community language practices. Use of these standards for classroom-based language assessment requires teachers to play a defining role, to observe, interpret and make judgements about students’ bi/multilingual language practice. However, STEP was developed and validated based on teacher perceptions of students’ language use, revealing the monolingual ideologies at work in Ontario education. The study concludes by discussing opportunities for teachers to identify, observe and document students’ multilingual practice through teacher-inquiry to align curriculum and assessment policy and practice with the sociolinguistic reality of Ontario’s multilingual classrooms and communities.","PeriodicalId":391103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multilingual Theories and Practices","volume":"2002 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multilingual Theories and Practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/jmtp.20395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reviewing the development and implementation of the Steps to English Proficiency (STEP) language proficiency assessment framework in Ontario, Canada, this article calls attention to how language proficiency is operationalised in English language proficiency (ELP) standards in ways that may institutionalise hierarchies among home, school and community language practices. Use of these standards for classroom-based language assessment requires teachers to play a defining role, to observe, interpret and make judgements about students’ bi/multilingual language practice. However, STEP was developed and validated based on teacher perceptions of students’ language use, revealing the monolingual ideologies at work in Ontario education. The study concludes by discussing opportunities for teachers to identify, observe and document students’ multilingual practice through teacher-inquiry to align curriculum and assessment policy and practice with the sociolinguistic reality of Ontario’s multilingual classrooms and communities.
本文回顾了加拿大安大略省语言能力评估框架STEP to English Proficiency (STEP)的发展和实施情况,呼吁人们关注语言能力如何在英语语言能力(ELP)标准中以可能使家庭、学校和社区语言实践之间的等级制度化的方式运作。使用这些标准进行课堂语言评估需要教师发挥定义作用,对学生的双/多语语言实践进行观察、解释和判断。然而,STEP是基于教师对学生语言使用的看法而开发和验证的,揭示了安大略省教育中起作用的单语意识形态。该研究最后讨论了教师通过教师探究来识别、观察和记录学生多语言实践的机会,以使课程和评估政策与实践与安大略省多语言教室和社区的社会语言学现实保持一致。