Experimental comparison of conventional and bus-clamping PWM methods based on electrical and acoustic noise spectra

A. C. Binojkumar, B. Saritha, G. Narayanan
{"title":"Experimental comparison of conventional and bus-clamping PWM methods based on electrical and acoustic noise spectra","authors":"A. C. Binojkumar, B. Saritha, G. Narayanan","doi":"10.1109/IICPE.2014.7115833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The acoustic noise emitted by an induction motor, powered by a voltage source inverter, is an environmental issue. Harmonics present in the stator current are the main reason for the increased acoustic noise in motor drives. The pulse-width modulation technique used to modulate the inverter is the key factor determining the magnitude of current harmonics. Bus-clamping pulse-width modulation (BCPWM) techniques have got much attention nowadays due to reduced switching loss, compared to conventional space vector pwm(CSVPWM). In this paper, two BCPWM techniques namely, 60° and 30° BCPWM methods are compared with CSVPWM on the basis of electrical spectra as well as acoustic noise spectra. Experiments are conducted on a pulse-width modulated voltage source inverter fed 6 kW induction motor drive. Harmonic analysis is carried out on the measured line to line voltage, stator current and acoustic noise, corresponding to the three methods, at different fundamental and carrier frequencies. Comparison of the experimental results show that the magnitude of dominant acoustic noise component around the carrier frequency is reduced significantly with BCPWM methods, compared to CSVPWM, at high modulation indices.","PeriodicalId":206767,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 6th India International Conference on Power Electronics (IICPE)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 6th India International Conference on Power Electronics (IICPE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IICPE.2014.7115833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The acoustic noise emitted by an induction motor, powered by a voltage source inverter, is an environmental issue. Harmonics present in the stator current are the main reason for the increased acoustic noise in motor drives. The pulse-width modulation technique used to modulate the inverter is the key factor determining the magnitude of current harmonics. Bus-clamping pulse-width modulation (BCPWM) techniques have got much attention nowadays due to reduced switching loss, compared to conventional space vector pwm(CSVPWM). In this paper, two BCPWM techniques namely, 60° and 30° BCPWM methods are compared with CSVPWM on the basis of electrical spectra as well as acoustic noise spectra. Experiments are conducted on a pulse-width modulated voltage source inverter fed 6 kW induction motor drive. Harmonic analysis is carried out on the measured line to line voltage, stator current and acoustic noise, corresponding to the three methods, at different fundamental and carrier frequencies. Comparison of the experimental results show that the magnitude of dominant acoustic noise component around the carrier frequency is reduced significantly with BCPWM methods, compared to CSVPWM, at high modulation indices.
基于电学和声学噪声谱的传统和母线箝位PWM方法的实验比较
由电压源逆变器供电的感应电动机发出的噪声是一个环境问题。定子电流中存在的谐波是电机驱动中噪声增加的主要原因。用于调制逆变器的脉宽调制技术是决定电流谐波大小的关键因素。与传统的空间矢量脉宽调制(CSVPWM)相比,总线箝位脉宽调制(BCPWM)技术由于能降低开关损耗而备受关注。本文在电谱和噪声谱的基础上,比较了60°和30°BCPWM两种BCPWM方法与CSVPWM方法。实验采用脉宽调制电压源逆变器供电6kw感应电机驱动。在不同的基频和载波频率下,对三种方法对应的被测线对线电压、定子电流和噪声进行谐波分析。实验结果表明,在高调制指数下,与CSVPWM相比,BCPWM方法显著降低了载波频率周围的优势噪声分量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信