Do Research Joint Ventures Serve a Collusive Function?

Eric A. Helland, Michelle Sovinsky
{"title":"Do Research Joint Ventures Serve a Collusive Function?","authors":"Eric A. Helland, Michelle Sovinsky","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1163268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Every year thousands of firms are engaged in research joint ventures (RJV), where all knowledge gained through R&D is shared among members. Most of the empirical literature assumes members are non-cooperative in the product market. But many RJV members are rivals leaving open the possibility that firms may form RJVs to facilitate product market collusion. We examine this by exploiting variation in RJV formation generated by a policy change that affects the collusive benefits but not the research synergies associated with a RJV. We use data on RJVs formed between 1986 and 2001 together with firm-level information from Compustat to estimate a RJV participation equation. After correcting for the endogeneity of R&D and controlling for RJV characteristics and firm attributes, we find the decision to join is impacted by the policy change. We also find the magnitude is significant: the policy change resulted in an average drop in the probability of joining a RJV of $41\\%$ among computer and semiconductor manufacturers, $34\\%$ among telecommunications firms, and $33\\%$ among petroleum refining firms. Our results are consistent with research joint ventures serving a collusive function.","PeriodicalId":407431,"journal":{"name":"Claremont McKenna College Robert Day School of Economics & Finance Research Paper Series","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Claremont McKenna College Robert Day School of Economics & Finance Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1163268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Every year thousands of firms are engaged in research joint ventures (RJV), where all knowledge gained through R&D is shared among members. Most of the empirical literature assumes members are non-cooperative in the product market. But many RJV members are rivals leaving open the possibility that firms may form RJVs to facilitate product market collusion. We examine this by exploiting variation in RJV formation generated by a policy change that affects the collusive benefits but not the research synergies associated with a RJV. We use data on RJVs formed between 1986 and 2001 together with firm-level information from Compustat to estimate a RJV participation equation. After correcting for the endogeneity of R&D and controlling for RJV characteristics and firm attributes, we find the decision to join is impacted by the policy change. We also find the magnitude is significant: the policy change resulted in an average drop in the probability of joining a RJV of $41\%$ among computer and semiconductor manufacturers, $34\%$ among telecommunications firms, and $33\%$ among petroleum refining firms. Our results are consistent with research joint ventures serving a collusive function.
研究合资企业是否具有串通作用?
每年都有成千上万的公司从事研究合资企业(RJV),所有通过研发获得的知识都在成员之间共享。大多数实证文献假设成员在产品市场上是不合作的。但许多合资企业成员是竞争对手,这就为企业组建合资企业以促进产品市场串通提供了可能。我们通过利用政策变化产生的RJV形成的变化来检验这一点,政策变化会影响串通利益,但不会影响与RJV相关的研究协同效应。我们使用1986年至2001年间形成的合资企业数据以及Compustat提供的公司层面信息来估计合资企业参与方程。在修正了研发内生性并控制了合资企业特征和企业属性后,我们发现政策变化会影响企业的加入决策。我们还发现,其幅度是显著的:政策变化导致计算机和半导体制造商加入RJV的概率平均下降了41%,电信公司下降了34%,石油炼制公司下降了33%。我们的研究结果与具有串通作用的研究合资企业相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信