Selection of online tools for creating math tests

O. Zaika, T. Vakaliuk, A. V. Riabko, R. Kukharchuk, I. Mintii, S. Semerikov
{"title":"Selection of online tools for creating math tests","authors":"O. Zaika, T. Vakaliuk, A. V. Riabko, R. Kukharchuk, I. Mintii, S. Semerikov","doi":"10.31812/123456789/4594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers online tools for creating tests, which should be used when teaching mathematics in both higher education and general secondary education. Among the variety of online means of creating tests by the method of expert evaluation, three were identified, which allow conducting various tests both in the classroom and remotely, which are free and do not require special conditions for their use and which work on smartphones. The advantages and disadvantages of three online tools for creating tests Kahoot!, Quizizz, Classtime are analyzed, and a comparative description of the selected tools is given. Criteria for the selection of such tools were identified – functional-didactic and organizational. The following indicators belong to the functional-didactic: the presence of different types of questions, including open-ended; use of formulas, both in questions and in answers; use of pictures, both in questions and in answers; no restrictions on the length of questions and answers; instant receipt of results by the teacher, their evaluation and analysis; instant receipt of results by the respondent; to the organizational: the availability of a free version; no need to install the program; ease of use – characterizes the convenience and clarity of the interface for creating tests and their use; possibility of testing in online and offline mode; time limits, both for a single question and the whole test; random order of questions/answer options; instant demonstration of the correct answer to the respondent. With the help of expert evaluation, it was found that according to these criteria, Quizizz is the most appropriate for testing.","PeriodicalId":274384,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Augmented Reality in Education","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Workshop on Augmented Reality in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31812/123456789/4594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The article considers online tools for creating tests, which should be used when teaching mathematics in both higher education and general secondary education. Among the variety of online means of creating tests by the method of expert evaluation, three were identified, which allow conducting various tests both in the classroom and remotely, which are free and do not require special conditions for their use and which work on smartphones. The advantages and disadvantages of three online tools for creating tests Kahoot!, Quizizz, Classtime are analyzed, and a comparative description of the selected tools is given. Criteria for the selection of such tools were identified – functional-didactic and organizational. The following indicators belong to the functional-didactic: the presence of different types of questions, including open-ended; use of formulas, both in questions and in answers; use of pictures, both in questions and in answers; no restrictions on the length of questions and answers; instant receipt of results by the teacher, their evaluation and analysis; instant receipt of results by the respondent; to the organizational: the availability of a free version; no need to install the program; ease of use – characterizes the convenience and clarity of the interface for creating tests and their use; possibility of testing in online and offline mode; time limits, both for a single question and the whole test; random order of questions/answer options; instant demonstration of the correct answer to the respondent. With the help of expert evaluation, it was found that according to these criteria, Quizizz is the most appropriate for testing.
选择创建数学测试的在线工具
本文探讨了在高等教育和普通中等教育数学教学中应使用的在线考试工具。在通过专家评估的方法创建测试的各种在线手段中,确定了三种,它们允许在教室和远程进行各种测试,这些测试是免费的,不需要特殊的使用条件,并且可以在智能手机上运行。三种在线测试创建工具的优缺点Kahoot!, Quizizz, Classtime进行了分析,并对所选择的工具进行了比较描述。确定了选择这些工具的标准-功能-教学和组织。下列指标属于功能性说教:提出不同类型的问题,包括开放式问题;在问题和答案中使用公式;在问题和答案中使用图片;不限制问题和答案的长度;教师即时收到结果、评估和分析;应答者即时收到结果;给组织:提供免费版本;无需安装程序;易于使用-表征创建测试及其使用的界面的便利性和清晰度;在线和离线测试的可能性;时间限制,包括单个问题和整个测试;问题/答案选项的随机顺序;即时示范正确答案的答辩。在专家评估的帮助下,发现根据这些标准,Quizizz是最适合测试的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信