The Implementation Of Common Core Standards: The Abandonment Of Creativity And Critical Thinking

Stephen Stunder
{"title":"The Implementation Of Common Core Standards: The Abandonment Of Creativity And Critical Thinking","authors":"Stephen Stunder","doi":"10.55138/sq104284jst","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores a brief history of Common Core implementation as well as develops an argument for the return of critical and creative thinking in public school curriculum. The importance of student and teacher development in the delivery on instruction and student retention was also explored. In 2010, Common Core was established as a new educational standard of learning goals to help prepare students for college, career, and life. Common Core standards have changed the way in which the educational community views critical thinking. Upon its implementation, the Common Core looked to standardize the delivery of curriculum in public education. Nonetheless, these standards have minimized the ability for students to demonstrate and express critical thinking and creativity over the years. Policymakers have taken a shortcut in delivering opinions on curricular changes, and students’ abilities to think critically and creatively have suffered. Prior to 2010, states established their own standards for proficiency, which many believed led to a lack of standardization of curriculum. Currently, 42 of the 50 states have adopted Common Core standards. Virginia, Texas, Alaska, and Nebraska are four states that never implemented these standards, and Arizona, Oklahoma, Indiana, and South Carolina are four states that have withdrawn from the Common Core standards. This standardization of curriculum has led to difficulty in implementation and a lack of creativity at both the student and teacher level. Teacher development provides teachers with professional development on curriculum delivery and pedagogy as well as the opportunity for students to access their critical thinking skills. This article is a meta-analysis of literature knowledge to advance professional practice. Keywords: Common Core, Creativity, Critical Thinking, Curriculum, Design","PeriodicalId":297709,"journal":{"name":"The Interdisciplinary Journal of Advances in Research in Education","volume":"195 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Interdisciplinary Journal of Advances in Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55138/sq104284jst","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores a brief history of Common Core implementation as well as develops an argument for the return of critical and creative thinking in public school curriculum. The importance of student and teacher development in the delivery on instruction and student retention was also explored. In 2010, Common Core was established as a new educational standard of learning goals to help prepare students for college, career, and life. Common Core standards have changed the way in which the educational community views critical thinking. Upon its implementation, the Common Core looked to standardize the delivery of curriculum in public education. Nonetheless, these standards have minimized the ability for students to demonstrate and express critical thinking and creativity over the years. Policymakers have taken a shortcut in delivering opinions on curricular changes, and students’ abilities to think critically and creatively have suffered. Prior to 2010, states established their own standards for proficiency, which many believed led to a lack of standardization of curriculum. Currently, 42 of the 50 states have adopted Common Core standards. Virginia, Texas, Alaska, and Nebraska are four states that never implemented these standards, and Arizona, Oklahoma, Indiana, and South Carolina are four states that have withdrawn from the Common Core standards. This standardization of curriculum has led to difficulty in implementation and a lack of creativity at both the student and teacher level. Teacher development provides teachers with professional development on curriculum delivery and pedagogy as well as the opportunity for students to access their critical thinking skills. This article is a meta-analysis of literature knowledge to advance professional practice. Keywords: Common Core, Creativity, Critical Thinking, Curriculum, Design
共同核心标准的实施:创造力和批判性思维的放弃
本文探讨了共同核心实施的简史,并提出了在公立学校课程中回归批判性和创造性思维的论点。学生和教师发展在教学交付和学生保留方面的重要性也进行了探讨。2010年,共同核心作为学习目标的新教育标准被确立,以帮助学生为大学、职业和生活做好准备。共同核心标准改变了教育界看待批判性思维的方式。在实施过程中,共同核心旨在使公共教育课程的教学标准化。然而,多年来,这些标准已经将学生展示和表达批判性思维和创造力的能力降到了最低。政策制定者在就课程改革发表意见时走了一条捷径,学生的批判性和创造性思维能力受到了影响。在2010年之前,各州建立了自己的熟练程度标准,许多人认为这导致了课程缺乏标准化。目前,50个州中有42个采用了共同核心标准。弗吉尼亚州、德克萨斯州、阿拉斯加州和内布拉斯加州是四个从未实施这些标准的州,亚利桑那州、俄克拉荷马州、印第安纳州和南卡罗来纳州是四个已经退出共同核心标准的州。这种课程标准化导致在学生和教师层面上实施困难和缺乏创造力。教师发展为教师提供课程交付和教学法方面的专业发展,并为学生提供获得批判性思维技能的机会。本文是对文献知识的元分析,以促进专业实践。关键词:共同核心,创造力,批判性思维,课程,设计
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信