{"title":"The Implementation Of Common Core Standards: The Abandonment Of Creativity And Critical Thinking","authors":"Stephen Stunder","doi":"10.55138/sq104284jst","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores a brief history of Common Core implementation as well as develops an argument for the return of critical and creative thinking in public school curriculum. The importance of student and teacher development in the delivery on instruction and student retention was also explored. In 2010, Common Core was established as a new educational standard of learning goals to help prepare students for college, career, and life. Common Core standards have changed the way in which the educational community views critical thinking. Upon its implementation, the Common Core looked to standardize the delivery of curriculum in public education. Nonetheless, these standards have minimized the ability for students to demonstrate and express critical thinking and creativity over the years. Policymakers have taken a shortcut in delivering opinions on curricular changes, and students’ abilities to think critically and creatively have suffered. Prior to 2010, states established their own standards for proficiency, which many believed led to a lack of standardization of curriculum. Currently, 42 of the 50 states have adopted Common Core standards. Virginia, Texas, Alaska, and Nebraska are four states that never implemented these standards, and Arizona, Oklahoma, Indiana, and South Carolina are four states that have withdrawn from the Common Core standards. This standardization of curriculum has led to difficulty in implementation and a lack of creativity at both the student and teacher level. Teacher development provides teachers with professional development on curriculum delivery and pedagogy as well as the opportunity for students to access their critical thinking skills. This article is a meta-analysis of literature knowledge to advance professional practice. Keywords: Common Core, Creativity, Critical Thinking, Curriculum, Design","PeriodicalId":297709,"journal":{"name":"The Interdisciplinary Journal of Advances in Research in Education","volume":"195 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Interdisciplinary Journal of Advances in Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55138/sq104284jst","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article explores a brief history of Common Core implementation as well as develops an argument for the return of critical and creative thinking in public school curriculum. The importance of student and teacher development in the delivery on instruction and student retention was also explored. In 2010, Common Core was established as a new educational standard of learning goals to help prepare students for college, career, and life. Common Core standards have changed the way in which the educational community views critical thinking. Upon its implementation, the Common Core looked to standardize the delivery of curriculum in public education. Nonetheless, these standards have minimized the ability for students to demonstrate and express critical thinking and creativity over the years. Policymakers have taken a shortcut in delivering opinions on curricular changes, and students’ abilities to think critically and creatively have suffered. Prior to 2010, states established their own standards for proficiency, which many believed led to a lack of standardization of curriculum. Currently, 42 of the 50 states have adopted Common Core standards. Virginia, Texas, Alaska, and Nebraska are four states that never implemented these standards, and Arizona, Oklahoma, Indiana, and South Carolina are four states that have withdrawn from the Common Core standards. This standardization of curriculum has led to difficulty in implementation and a lack of creativity at both the student and teacher level. Teacher development provides teachers with professional development on curriculum delivery and pedagogy as well as the opportunity for students to access their critical thinking skills. This article is a meta-analysis of literature knowledge to advance professional practice. Keywords: Common Core, Creativity, Critical Thinking, Curriculum, Design