Comparing measured performance and perceived learning in group tasks of a Civil Engineering Technology course

C. Chan, A. Suratkon, A. Shamsuddin
{"title":"Comparing measured performance and perceived learning in group tasks of a Civil Engineering Technology course","authors":"C. Chan, A. Suratkon, A. Shamsuddin","doi":"10.1109/ICEED.2015.7451490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students were requested to complete a survey form with relation to the attainment of learning outcomes via the coursework activities at the end of a core undergraduate civil engineering technology course, i.e. Soil Mechanics and Foundations. The tasks involved topical Assignments, Lab Work and a Project. These group endeavours were carried out by students in the same group formations throughout the 14-week semester. The survey also examined the cultivation of soft skills in the process of completing the group tasks. In addition, students also completed an online survey entitled “Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire” (http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html) based on the Felder-Silverman model [4]. Analysis was made on the grades and performance of the students, the students' presumed attainment of learning outcomes and soft skills development. These were next compared with the preferred learning styles of the students as profiled by the Felder-Silverman model. Students' perceptions of soft skills developed in the process of completing the tasks appeared to be directly related to the group performance and learning outcomes attained. Nevertheless the academic performance or grades were not always found in congruence with the learning outcomes thought to be achieved by the students. Also, the learner type composition of a group apparently exerted a rather significant influence on the overall group performance in the coursework tasks. In summary, the designated learning outcomes of the course were achieved with simultaneous cultivation of relevant soft skills among students, and to a certain extent, influenced by the learner type profile of the respective groups.","PeriodicalId":195559,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2015.7451490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Students were requested to complete a survey form with relation to the attainment of learning outcomes via the coursework activities at the end of a core undergraduate civil engineering technology course, i.e. Soil Mechanics and Foundations. The tasks involved topical Assignments, Lab Work and a Project. These group endeavours were carried out by students in the same group formations throughout the 14-week semester. The survey also examined the cultivation of soft skills in the process of completing the group tasks. In addition, students also completed an online survey entitled “Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire” (http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html) based on the Felder-Silverman model [4]. Analysis was made on the grades and performance of the students, the students' presumed attainment of learning outcomes and soft skills development. These were next compared with the preferred learning styles of the students as profiled by the Felder-Silverman model. Students' perceptions of soft skills developed in the process of completing the tasks appeared to be directly related to the group performance and learning outcomes attained. Nevertheless the academic performance or grades were not always found in congruence with the learning outcomes thought to be achieved by the students. Also, the learner type composition of a group apparently exerted a rather significant influence on the overall group performance in the coursework tasks. In summary, the designated learning outcomes of the course were achieved with simultaneous cultivation of relevant soft skills among students, and to a certain extent, influenced by the learner type profile of the respective groups.
比较土木工程技术课程小组任务的测量表现和感知学习
学生们被要求完成一份调查表格,调查他们在完成核心的本科土木工程技术课程(即土力学和地基)后,通过课程活动获得的学习成果。任务包括专题作业、实验作业和一个项目。在为期14周的学期中,学生们以相同的小组形式进行这些小组活动。调查还考察了在完成小组任务过程中软技能的培养。此外,学生还完成了基于Felder-Silverman模型[4]的“学习风格指数问卷”(http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html)在线调查。分析学生的成绩和表现、学生对学习成果的预期达成和软技能的发展。然后将这些结果与费尔德-西尔弗曼模型所描述的学生偏好的学习方式进行比较。学生对在完成任务过程中发展的软技能的感知似乎与小组表现和学习成果直接相关。然而,学业表现或成绩并不总是与学生认为取得的学习成果一致。小组的学习者类型构成对小组在课程任务中的整体表现有显著的影响。综上所述,课程的指定学习成果是在培养学生相关软技能的同时实现的,并在一定程度上受到各自群体学习者类型概况的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信