Safety assessment of personal mobility devices with different wheel size based on their dynamic stability performance

M. Paudel, F. F. Yap, A. Bastola
{"title":"Safety assessment of personal mobility devices with different wheel size based on their dynamic stability performance","authors":"M. Paudel, F. F. Yap, A. Bastola","doi":"10.1504/ijsdes.2020.10034432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been a rapidly growing trend in the use of small-wheeled personal mobility devices (PMDs) such as small-wheeled electric scooters and bicycles for urban mobility in many cities worldwide. However, it is a well-known fact that most of them do not ride as well as conventional big wheel bicycles, and the ride is often described as 'twitchy', 'wobbly' and 'less stable'. A considerable number of casualties involve single-vehicle accidents which can be correlated to their dynamic stability performance. This paper relates the vehicle frame design with safety performance. By using a well-defined mathematical model, the dynamic stability of different personal mobility devices was compared. The research confirms the lesser stability in existing small wheel electric scooters and bicycles. However, the investigation has also found that the reason is not so much the size of the wheel, but the inadequacy of current design practice to properly account for the complex influence of wheel size on stability. Finally, a case study has been presented to illustrate that current designs of small wheel PMDs can be improved for better stability and safety.","PeriodicalId":306645,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Design","volume":"189 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainable Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsdes.2020.10034432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

There has been a rapidly growing trend in the use of small-wheeled personal mobility devices (PMDs) such as small-wheeled electric scooters and bicycles for urban mobility in many cities worldwide. However, it is a well-known fact that most of them do not ride as well as conventional big wheel bicycles, and the ride is often described as 'twitchy', 'wobbly' and 'less stable'. A considerable number of casualties involve single-vehicle accidents which can be correlated to their dynamic stability performance. This paper relates the vehicle frame design with safety performance. By using a well-defined mathematical model, the dynamic stability of different personal mobility devices was compared. The research confirms the lesser stability in existing small wheel electric scooters and bicycles. However, the investigation has also found that the reason is not so much the size of the wheel, but the inadequacy of current design practice to properly account for the complex influence of wheel size on stability. Finally, a case study has been presented to illustrate that current designs of small wheel PMDs can be improved for better stability and safety.
基于动态稳定性能的不同车轮尺寸个人移动装置安全性评价
在全球许多城市,使用小型轮式个人移动设备(PMDs),如小型轮式电动滑板车和自行车,用于城市交通的趋势正在迅速增长。然而,众所周知的事实是,它们中的大多数都不如传统的大轮自行车骑得好,而且骑起来经常被描述为“抽搐”、“摇晃”和“不太稳定”。相当多的伤亡事故涉及单车辆事故,这与车辆的动态稳定性能有关。本文论述了车架设计与安全性能的关系。通过建立良好的数学模型,比较了不同个人移动装置的动态稳定性。研究证实,现有的小轮电动滑板车和自行车的稳定性较差。然而,调查也发现,原因并不是车轮的尺寸,而是目前的设计实践没有充分考虑到车轮尺寸对稳定性的复杂影响。最后,通过实例分析说明,目前的小轮PMDs设计可以改进,以获得更好的稳定性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信