Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Lymphocyte-Monocyte Ratio (LMR) as Covid-19 Screening Parameters

H. Syahrini, T. H. Fadjari, Nadjwa Zamalek Dalimoenthe
{"title":"Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Lymphocyte-Monocyte Ratio (LMR) as Covid-19 Screening Parameters","authors":"H. Syahrini, T. H. Fadjari, Nadjwa Zamalek Dalimoenthe","doi":"10.33086/ijmlst.v4i1.2281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Covid-19 diagnosis generally uses RT-PCR as the gold standard to detect coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2); however, this method requires advanced laboratory equipment. Alternatively, Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Lymphocyte-Monocyte Ratio (LMR) can be used to identify viral infection. The study aimed: (1) to compare each NLR and LMR ratio in patients with and without COVID-19 and (2) to test the effectiveness of these ratios in identifying COVID-19. The study was conducted at the Haji Adam Malik Central General Hospital by acquiring 87 medical records data. The complete hematologic profile was analyzed from patients with and without COVID-19. The NLR and LMR ratio accuracy were analyzed as a screening tool for COVID-19. The AUC of NLR was 0.638, with cut-off ≤ 2.49, 47.6% sensitivity, and 80% specificity; therefore, the NLR accuracy as a screening for COVID-19 was defined as not good (just sufficient) because of AUC <0,7. The AUC of LMR was 0.661, with cut-off ≥ 3.23, 45.2% sensitivity, and 82.2% specificity; therefore, the LMR accuracy as a screening parameter for COVID-19 is defined as not good (just sufficient) because of AUC <0,7. There were significant differences in hematologic profile in neutrophil, lymphocyte, NLR, LMR between the patients in the COVID-19 group and non-COVID-19 group. NLR and LMR cannot be used as a screening tool because the Area Under Curve (AUC) is not good enough (just sufficient) in detecting COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":158539,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Medical Laboratory Science and Technology","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Medical Laboratory Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33086/ijmlst.v4i1.2281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Covid-19 diagnosis generally uses RT-PCR as the gold standard to detect coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2); however, this method requires advanced laboratory equipment. Alternatively, Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Lymphocyte-Monocyte Ratio (LMR) can be used to identify viral infection. The study aimed: (1) to compare each NLR and LMR ratio in patients with and without COVID-19 and (2) to test the effectiveness of these ratios in identifying COVID-19. The study was conducted at the Haji Adam Malik Central General Hospital by acquiring 87 medical records data. The complete hematologic profile was analyzed from patients with and without COVID-19. The NLR and LMR ratio accuracy were analyzed as a screening tool for COVID-19. The AUC of NLR was 0.638, with cut-off ≤ 2.49, 47.6% sensitivity, and 80% specificity; therefore, the NLR accuracy as a screening for COVID-19 was defined as not good (just sufficient) because of AUC <0,7. The AUC of LMR was 0.661, with cut-off ≥ 3.23, 45.2% sensitivity, and 82.2% specificity; therefore, the LMR accuracy as a screening parameter for COVID-19 is defined as not good (just sufficient) because of AUC <0,7. There were significant differences in hematologic profile in neutrophil, lymphocyte, NLR, LMR between the patients in the COVID-19 group and non-COVID-19 group. NLR and LMR cannot be used as a screening tool because the Area Under Curve (AUC) is not good enough (just sufficient) in detecting COVID-19.
中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率(NLR)和淋巴细胞-单核细胞比率(LMR)作为Covid-19筛查参数
Covid-19诊断一般以RT-PCR为金标准检测冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2);然而,这种方法需要先进的实验室设备。另外,中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率(NLR)和淋巴细胞-单核细胞比率(LMR)可用于识别病毒感染。本研究的目的是:(1)比较COVID-19患者和非COVID-19患者的NLR和LMR比值;(2)检验这些比值对COVID-19识别的有效性。这项研究是在哈吉亚当马利克中央总医院进行的,获取了87份医疗记录数据。分析了患有和未患有COVID-19的患者的完整血液学特征。分析NLR和LMR比值作为COVID-19筛查工具的准确性。NLR的AUC为0.638,cut-off≤2.49,敏感性47.6%,特异性80%;因此,由于AUC <0,7, NLR作为COVID-19筛查的准确性被定义为不好(刚刚足够)。LMR的AUC为0.661,cut-off≥3.23,敏感性45.2%,特异性82.2%;因此,由于AUC <0,7, LMR作为COVID-19筛查参数的准确性被定义为不好(刚好足够)。新冠肺炎组与非新冠肺炎组患者在中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞、NLR、LMR等血液学指标上存在显著差异。NLR和LMR不能作为筛查工具,因为曲线下面积(AUC)在检测COVID-19方面不够好(刚刚足够)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信