Tinjauan Soal Penilaian Tengah Semester Pada Materi Matematika Berdasarkan Tingkat Kognitif Peserta Didik Di Sekolah Dasar

J. Jamaludin, E. Nur’aeni, Yusuf Suryana, Ika Fitri Apriani
{"title":"Tinjauan Soal Penilaian Tengah Semester Pada Materi Matematika Berdasarkan Tingkat Kognitif Peserta Didik Di Sekolah Dasar","authors":"J. Jamaludin, E. Nur’aeni, Yusuf Suryana, Ika Fitri Apriani","doi":"10.31100/dikdas.v5i3.2171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose is to reveal the assessment questions to review the percentage and suitability of that. The method used is a descriptive method of document analysis. The object is the mid-semester assessment of math class VI in one of the elementary schools in Cibeureum District, Tasikmalaya City. Data collection techniques through interviews and documentation studies. The instrument used is guidelines analysis sheets, a rubric / matrix based on Bloom's taxonomy and interview guidelines. Data analysis includes the stages of data collection, reduction, presentation and drawing conclusions. The results revealed that 80% questions were in accordance with the operational verb indicators at the cognitive level of C2 (understanding). The percentage of questions obtained is 100% of the total questions at the cognitive level C2 (understanding). From the responses of educators, it was obtained: (1) not paying attention to the preparation of learning assessments based on cognitive levels and tending to refer to operational verbs at the level of basic competence, (2) teacher tend to be have difficulty solving problems based on Higher Order Thinking Skills in mid -semester assessments.","PeriodicalId":375692,"journal":{"name":"DIKDAS MATAPPA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIKDAS MATAPPA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31100/dikdas.v5i3.2171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose is to reveal the assessment questions to review the percentage and suitability of that. The method used is a descriptive method of document analysis. The object is the mid-semester assessment of math class VI in one of the elementary schools in Cibeureum District, Tasikmalaya City. Data collection techniques through interviews and documentation studies. The instrument used is guidelines analysis sheets, a rubric / matrix based on Bloom's taxonomy and interview guidelines. Data analysis includes the stages of data collection, reduction, presentation and drawing conclusions. The results revealed that 80% questions were in accordance with the operational verb indicators at the cognitive level of C2 (understanding). The percentage of questions obtained is 100% of the total questions at the cognitive level C2 (understanding). From the responses of educators, it was obtained: (1) not paying attention to the preparation of learning assessments based on cognitive levels and tending to refer to operational verbs at the level of basic competence, (2) teacher tend to be have difficulty solving problems based on Higher Order Thinking Skills in mid -semester assessments.
基于小学学习者的认知水平,对学期期中数学材料的评估
目的是揭示评估问题,以审查的百分比和适用性。使用的方法是文献分析的描述性方法。本研究的对象是在Tasikmalaya市Cibeureum区的一所小学的数学六班的期中评估。通过访谈和文献研究收集数据的技术。使用的工具是指南分析表,这是基于布鲁姆分类法和访谈指南的标题/矩阵。数据分析包括数据收集、整理、呈现和得出结论等阶段。结果显示,80%的问题符合C2(理解)认知水平的操作性动词指标。获得的问题百分比为认知水平C2(理解)总问题的100%。从教育工作者的反应可以看出:(1)不重视基于认知水平的学习评估的准备,在基本能力水平上倾向于使用操作动词;(2)教师在中期评估中往往难以解决基于高阶思维技能的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信