Barriers and facilitators to providing human immunodeficiency virus pre-exposure prophylaxis decision support to black patients in Canada: a cross-sectional study

G. Guillaume, S. R. Ramos, Gamji M'Rabiu Abubakari, DeAnne Turner, Wale Ajiboye, Abban Yusuf, P. Djiadeu, Apondi J Odhiambo, Cheryl Pedersen, Aisha Lofters, Geoffrey Williams, LaRon E Nelson
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators to providing human immunodeficiency virus pre-exposure prophylaxis decision support to black patients in Canada: a cross-sectional study","authors":"G. Guillaume, S. R. Ramos, Gamji M'Rabiu Abubakari, DeAnne Turner, Wale Ajiboye, Abban Yusuf, P. Djiadeu, Apondi J Odhiambo, Cheryl Pedersen, Aisha Lofters, Geoffrey Williams, LaRon E Nelson","doi":"10.32920/ihtp.v1i3.1457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Healthcare settings can build towards a specific social environment, in which Black patients can make informed health decisions, including those about whether or not to use PrEP. We utilize self-determination theory for guidance to identify the extent to which current HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) decision support practices from healthcare professionals (HCP) are autonomy supportive. This identifies future developments and implementations of interventions for HCP capacity building to enhance the autonomy of Black patients who are considering using PrEP. Methods: Using a cross-sectional design for examining HCPs' perspectives on delivering quality PrEP usage-related decision support. Through a cross-sectional online survey of 24 HCP from 10 community-based health centers serving in Toronto, Canada, descriptive statistics were characterized in close-ended survey data and sample.  Open-ended survey responses were analyzed using Q- sorting methodology. Results: Of the HCP, 40%  were willing to provide PrEP decision support to Black-identified patients. HCP reported barriers of needing education about PrEP and available resources (96%) There’s a need for more education and resources to facilitate decision support for Black patients to improve decision support and reduce PrEP uptake disparities. Conclusion: It is imperative that cultural humility in healthcare is upheld to provide informed decision support since not only health conditions vary from patient to patient, but life experiences and background are equally crucial to the health status of that individual. Competence development among HCP can take the forms of providing training to increase cultural humility awareness, knowledge, and skills that can build towards an environment in which Black patients are informed about and for their health decisions.","PeriodicalId":231465,"journal":{"name":"International Health Trends and Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Health Trends and Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32920/ihtp.v1i3.1457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Healthcare settings can build towards a specific social environment, in which Black patients can make informed health decisions, including those about whether or not to use PrEP. We utilize self-determination theory for guidance to identify the extent to which current HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) decision support practices from healthcare professionals (HCP) are autonomy supportive. This identifies future developments and implementations of interventions for HCP capacity building to enhance the autonomy of Black patients who are considering using PrEP. Methods: Using a cross-sectional design for examining HCPs' perspectives on delivering quality PrEP usage-related decision support. Through a cross-sectional online survey of 24 HCP from 10 community-based health centers serving in Toronto, Canada, descriptive statistics were characterized in close-ended survey data and sample.  Open-ended survey responses were analyzed using Q- sorting methodology. Results: Of the HCP, 40%  were willing to provide PrEP decision support to Black-identified patients. HCP reported barriers of needing education about PrEP and available resources (96%) There’s a need for more education and resources to facilitate decision support for Black patients to improve decision support and reduce PrEP uptake disparities. Conclusion: It is imperative that cultural humility in healthcare is upheld to provide informed decision support since not only health conditions vary from patient to patient, but life experiences and background are equally crucial to the health status of that individual. Competence development among HCP can take the forms of providing training to increase cultural humility awareness, knowledge, and skills that can build towards an environment in which Black patients are informed about and for their health decisions.
向加拿大黑人患者提供人类免疫缺陷病毒暴露前预防决策支持的障碍和促进因素:一项横断面研究
导论:医疗保健机构可以建立一个特定的社会环境,在这个环境中,黑人患者可以做出明智的健康决定,包括是否使用PrEP。我们利用自决理论来指导,以确定目前来自医疗保健专业人员(HCP)的HIV暴露前预防(PrEP)决策支持实践在多大程度上是自主支持的。本研究确定了HCP能力建设的未来发展和干预措施的实施,以增强正在考虑使用PrEP的黑人患者的自主权。方法:使用横断面设计来检查HCP在提供高质量PrEP使用相关决策支持方面的观点。通过对加拿大多伦多10个社区卫生中心的24名HCP进行横断面在线调查,描述性统计以封闭式调查数据和样本为特征。采用Q-排序法对开放式调查结果进行分析。结果:40%的HCP愿意为Black-identified患者提供PrEP决策支持。HCP报告了需要PrEP教育和可用资源的障碍(96%)需要更多的教育和资源来促进对黑人患者的决策支持,以改善决策支持并减少PrEP使用的差异。结论:在医疗保健中,必须坚持文化谦逊,以提供知情的决策支持,因为不仅每个患者的健康状况各不相同,而且生活经历和背景对个体的健康状况同样至关重要。HCP之间的能力发展可以采取提供培训的形式,以提高文化谦逊意识、知识和技能,从而建立一个环境,使黑人患者了解并为他们的健康决定服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信