Causes

A. Lang
{"title":"Causes","authors":"A. Lang","doi":"10.7551/mitpress/12307.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter surveys the principal political events that contributed to the crisis of Union. Rather than portraying a sectional South vs. a nationalist North (an old historiographical trope long displaced by current scholarship), the chapter features slaveholders, antislavery activists, and multiracial abolitionists all laying claim to the American Union. Proponents of slavery considered the United States unique because most of the world by mid-century had abolished forms of unfree labor. Only in the Union, so went the thinking, could slavery thrive and expand. But antislavery critics argued that a slaveholding Union violated the spirit of the American founding, tarnishing the republic’s unique democracy. Competing claims to American exceptionalism rooted in irreconcilable debates about slavery gave voice to Lincoln’s belief that “a house divided against itself cannot stand.” The Union had to be either all slave or all free, a proposition that the political system strained to resolve.","PeriodicalId":262145,"journal":{"name":"A Contest of Civilizations","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A Contest of Civilizations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12307.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter surveys the principal political events that contributed to the crisis of Union. Rather than portraying a sectional South vs. a nationalist North (an old historiographical trope long displaced by current scholarship), the chapter features slaveholders, antislavery activists, and multiracial abolitionists all laying claim to the American Union. Proponents of slavery considered the United States unique because most of the world by mid-century had abolished forms of unfree labor. Only in the Union, so went the thinking, could slavery thrive and expand. But antislavery critics argued that a slaveholding Union violated the spirit of the American founding, tarnishing the republic’s unique democracy. Competing claims to American exceptionalism rooted in irreconcilable debates about slavery gave voice to Lincoln’s belief that “a house divided against itself cannot stand.” The Union had to be either all slave or all free, a proposition that the political system strained to resolve.
原因
本章概述了导致联邦危机的主要政治事件。这一章并没有描绘一个局部的南方与一个民族主义的北方(这是一个古老的历史修辞,早已被当前的学术所取代),而是刻画了奴隶主、反奴隶制活动家和多种族废奴主义者都声称拥有美国联邦。奴隶制的支持者认为美国是独一无二的,因为到本世纪中叶,世界上大多数国家已经废除了各种形式的不自由劳动。他们的想法是,只有在联邦里,奴隶制才能兴旺发展。但反对奴隶制的批评者认为,蓄奴联盟违背了美国建国精神,玷污了这个共和国独特的民主。对美国例外论的相互竞争根植于关于奴隶制的不可调和的辩论,这让林肯的信念发出了声音,即“一个分裂的家庭是无法生存的”。联邦要么全是奴隶,要么全是自由人,这是一个政治体系难以解决的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信