Censorship and the Limits of the Literary: A Global View

J. Osborn
{"title":"Censorship and the Limits of the Literary: A Global View","authors":"J. Osborn","doi":"10.5860/choice.196549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Censorship and the limits of the literary: a global view, edited by Nicole Moore (Bloomsbury, 2015)This volume of essays, edited by literary historian Nicole Moore, explores the dynamic between literature and censorship. Moore describes her collaborative scholarly project in these terms: 'The essays ... engage with more than twelve countries or nation states, placing into revealing contiguity a set of case studies examining national regimes, publishing industries, book trades, reading contexts or authorial circumstances' (5)Her introduction proposes two possible approaches to reading Censorship and the limits of the literary. First, through the four-part 'chronologically-ordered' structure, beginning in the Enlightenment with Simon Burrows's essay on 'French Censorship on the Eve of the Revolution', through the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries to the Cold War (Part III) and then 'the final, contemporary section [which] has much to say about our world right now' (7). Within this structure, the reader can also move easily across the book's global perspective, selecting chapters on a range of countries, including South Africa, Quebec, East Germany, Australia, China and Iran.The second approach recommended by Moore turns on 'the volume's reflect[ing] a moment of congruence, when new directions in a number of scholarly fields are converging' (2). This approach would work well for the specialist reader, one who is willing to engage with Foucault's theories relating to contemporary censorship scholarship and 'the degree to which, rather than removed and antithetical opposites, literature and censorship have been dialectical forms of culture, each actively defining the other in ongoing, agonistic engagement' (2). The 'scholarly fields' mentioned include various forms of literary studies, history, theatre, film, books and printing.The contributors' areas of expertise, and the accompanying case studies, focus on historical period and on place. For example, Peter McDonald's excellent essay on 'the Critic as Censor' deals with Apartheid South Africa, where censorship was 'always officially euphemized as \"publications control\"'. McDonald is also the author of The Literature Police: Apartheid Censorship and its Cultural Consequences (2009); in his essay in Moore's collection, he covers the white, universityeducated, predominantly male censors who acted as 'guardians of the literary'. These were men who allowed J.M. Coetzee into their 'Republic of Letters ... despite [his] obvious offensiveness towards the government' while excluding Wilbur Smith, writer of 'morally corrupting pulp fiction for the masses' (124).Christine Spittel's rewarding essay, 'Reading the Enemy', deals with East German censorship during the 1990s. …","PeriodicalId":135762,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Literature","volume":"341 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.196549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Censorship and the limits of the literary: a global view, edited by Nicole Moore (Bloomsbury, 2015)This volume of essays, edited by literary historian Nicole Moore, explores the dynamic between literature and censorship. Moore describes her collaborative scholarly project in these terms: 'The essays ... engage with more than twelve countries or nation states, placing into revealing contiguity a set of case studies examining national regimes, publishing industries, book trades, reading contexts or authorial circumstances' (5)Her introduction proposes two possible approaches to reading Censorship and the limits of the literary. First, through the four-part 'chronologically-ordered' structure, beginning in the Enlightenment with Simon Burrows's essay on 'French Censorship on the Eve of the Revolution', through the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries to the Cold War (Part III) and then 'the final, contemporary section [which] has much to say about our world right now' (7). Within this structure, the reader can also move easily across the book's global perspective, selecting chapters on a range of countries, including South Africa, Quebec, East Germany, Australia, China and Iran.The second approach recommended by Moore turns on 'the volume's reflect[ing] a moment of congruence, when new directions in a number of scholarly fields are converging' (2). This approach would work well for the specialist reader, one who is willing to engage with Foucault's theories relating to contemporary censorship scholarship and 'the degree to which, rather than removed and antithetical opposites, literature and censorship have been dialectical forms of culture, each actively defining the other in ongoing, agonistic engagement' (2). The 'scholarly fields' mentioned include various forms of literary studies, history, theatre, film, books and printing.The contributors' areas of expertise, and the accompanying case studies, focus on historical period and on place. For example, Peter McDonald's excellent essay on 'the Critic as Censor' deals with Apartheid South Africa, where censorship was 'always officially euphemized as "publications control"'. McDonald is also the author of The Literature Police: Apartheid Censorship and its Cultural Consequences (2009); in his essay in Moore's collection, he covers the white, universityeducated, predominantly male censors who acted as 'guardians of the literary'. These were men who allowed J.M. Coetzee into their 'Republic of Letters ... despite [his] obvious offensiveness towards the government' while excluding Wilbur Smith, writer of 'morally corrupting pulp fiction for the masses' (124).Christine Spittel's rewarding essay, 'Reading the Enemy', deals with East German censorship during the 1990s. …
审查制度与文学的局限:一个全球视角
审查制度和文学的限制:全球视野,由尼科尔·摩尔编辑(布卢姆斯伯里出版社,2015年)。这卷散文,由文学史学家尼科尔·摩尔编辑,探讨文学和审查制度之间的动态。摩尔这样描述她的合作学术项目:“论文……与超过12个国家或民族国家进行接触,将一系列案例研究置于揭示的连续性中,研究国家政权、出版业、图书贸易、阅读环境或作者环境。(5)她的介绍提出了两种可能的阅读审查和文学限制的方法。首先,通过四部分“按时间顺序”的结构,从启蒙运动的西蒙·巴罗斯的文章《大革命前夕的法国审查制度》开始,通过19世纪和20世纪初的冷战(第三部分),然后是“最后的当代部分,它对我们现在的世界有很多看法”(7)。在这种结构中,读者也可以轻松地跨越本书的全球视角,选择关于一系列国家的章节,包括南非、魁北克、东德、澳大利亚、中国和伊朗。摩尔推荐的第二种方法开启了“这本书反映了一个一致的时刻,当许多学术领域的新方向正在趋同时”(2)。这种方法对专业读者很有用,他们愿意参与福柯与当代审查学术有关的理论,以及“文学和审查在某种程度上不是相互移除和对立,而是文化的辩证形式”。每一方都在持续的、激烈的参与中积极地定义对方”(2)。提到的“学术领域”包括各种形式的文学研究、历史、戏剧、电影、书籍和印刷。作者的专业领域,以及附带的案例研究,集中在历史时期和地点。例如,彼得·麦克唐纳(Peter McDonald)在《批评家作为审查者》(the Critic as censorship)一文中论述了种族隔离的南非,在那里,审查“总是被官方委婉地称为‘出版控制’”。麦克唐纳还著有《文学警察:种族隔离审查及其文化后果》(2009);在摩尔文集中的文章中,他谈到了白人、受过大学教育、以男性为主的审查者,他们扮演着“文学守护者”的角色。这些人允许J.M.库切进入他们的“文学共和国”……尽管(他)对政府有明显的冒犯”,同时排除了威尔伯·史密斯(Wilbur Smith),这位“为大众撰写道德败坏的低俗小说”的作家(124)。克里斯汀·斯皮泰尔(Christine Spittel)的获奖文章《解读敌人》(Reading the Enemy)探讨了上世纪90年代东德的审查制度。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信