A Meta-Analysis of Middle School Students’ Science Engagement

Leanna B. Aker, A. Ellis
{"title":"A Meta-Analysis of Middle School Students’ Science Engagement","authors":"Leanna B. Aker, A. Ellis","doi":"10.53308/ide.v6i1.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The extent to which middle school students are engaged in required science courses is an elusive but increasingly documented phenomenon. Anecdotal and empirical evidence alike raise concern with a perceived decline in science engagement reported by students as they transition into the middle school setting. Even what it means to be engagé is not thoroughly agreed on. Though an agreed-on operational definition of engagement is still nascent, an emerging consensus on a three-faceted model of student engagement exists in the research literature (Fredricks, Blumenfeld, & Paris, 2004). Thus, a synthesis of existing primary research of early adolescents’ science engagement under this emerging conceptualization is warranted. The results of this meta-analysis indicate that instructional methods, class characteristics and competence predictors comprise the strongest relationship with self-reported science engagement in early adolescence. These predictors also show the strongest relationship with affective and cognitive engagement sub-types. Though affective and cognitive engagement were well-represented in primary studies, behavioral engagement was under-represented in student self-reports.","PeriodicalId":387459,"journal":{"name":"International Dialogues on Education Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Dialogues on Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53308/ide.v6i1.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The extent to which middle school students are engaged in required science courses is an elusive but increasingly documented phenomenon. Anecdotal and empirical evidence alike raise concern with a perceived decline in science engagement reported by students as they transition into the middle school setting. Even what it means to be engagé is not thoroughly agreed on. Though an agreed-on operational definition of engagement is still nascent, an emerging consensus on a three-faceted model of student engagement exists in the research literature (Fredricks, Blumenfeld, & Paris, 2004). Thus, a synthesis of existing primary research of early adolescents’ science engagement under this emerging conceptualization is warranted. The results of this meta-analysis indicate that instructional methods, class characteristics and competence predictors comprise the strongest relationship with self-reported science engagement in early adolescence. These predictors also show the strongest relationship with affective and cognitive engagement sub-types. Though affective and cognitive engagement were well-represented in primary studies, behavioral engagement was under-represented in student self-reports.
中学生科学投入的元分析
中学生参与必修科学课程的程度是一个难以捉摸但越来越多文献记载的现象。轶事和经验证据都引起了人们的关注,因为学生们报告说,随着他们过渡到中学环境,科学参与度明显下降。就连“参与”的含义也没有完全达成一致。尽管对敬业度的可操作性定义仍处于萌芽阶段,但在研究文献中,关于学生敬业度的三面模型已逐渐形成共识(Fredricks, Blumenfeld, & Paris, 2004)。因此,在这种新兴的概念化下,对现有的早期青少年科学参与的初步研究进行综合是有必要的。本荟萃分析的结果表明,教学方法、班级特征和能力预测因子与青少年早期自我报告的科学参与关系最强。这些预测因素也显示出与情感和认知投入亚型的最强关系。虽然情感投入和认知投入在初级研究中得到了充分体现,但行为投入在学生自我报告中却没有得到充分体现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信