{"title":"Memory Self-Efficacy and Community Participation","authors":"Genna M. Mashinchi, C. Ravesloot","doi":"10.52214/gsjp.v19i.10063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study examines the relationships between working memory, memory self-efficacy (MSE), and community participation among older adults.\nMethod: 203 United States older adults (age 55+) were recruited through MTurk to complete surveys and a memory task. A multiple linear regression was used to regress MSE and community participation.\nMain Findings: Entering all variables into the model explained 45% of the variance in community participation (R2 = .45, Adj. R2 = .41, F(7, 141) T = 16.26, p < .001). MSE was positively related to community participation (β = .38, p < .001), as predicted. However, contrary to hypotheses, worse working memory (β = -.22, p = .001) and greater difficulty remembering/concentrating (β = .26, p < .001) predicted higher levels of community participation.\nConclusions: It is reasonable to conclude that one’s beliefs about their memory ability is an important consideration when one chooses to engage in community events.\nKeywords: memory self-efficacy, community participation, aging, dementia, Alzheimer’s disease","PeriodicalId":208098,"journal":{"name":"Graduate Student Journal of Psychology","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graduate Student Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52214/gsjp.v19i.10063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective: This study examines the relationships between working memory, memory self-efficacy (MSE), and community participation among older adults.
Method: 203 United States older adults (age 55+) were recruited through MTurk to complete surveys and a memory task. A multiple linear regression was used to regress MSE and community participation.
Main Findings: Entering all variables into the model explained 45% of the variance in community participation (R2 = .45, Adj. R2 = .41, F(7, 141) T = 16.26, p < .001). MSE was positively related to community participation (β = .38, p < .001), as predicted. However, contrary to hypotheses, worse working memory (β = -.22, p = .001) and greater difficulty remembering/concentrating (β = .26, p < .001) predicted higher levels of community participation.
Conclusions: It is reasonable to conclude that one’s beliefs about their memory ability is an important consideration when one chooses to engage in community events.
Keywords: memory self-efficacy, community participation, aging, dementia, Alzheimer’s disease