Abstract A27: Diversity in multiple myeloma clinical trials

N. Duma, M. G. Velez, Jesús Vera-Aguilera, Richardo Parrondo, V. Mariotti, J. Paludo, Yucai Wang, R. Go, A. Adjei
{"title":"Abstract A27: Diversity in multiple myeloma clinical trials","authors":"N. Duma, M. G. Velez, Jesús Vera-Aguilera, Richardo Parrondo, V. Mariotti, J. Paludo, Yucai Wang, R. Go, A. Adjei","doi":"10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-A27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) accounts for approximately 1% of all cancers and 10% of hematologic malignancies in the United States (U.S.). MM occurs in all races, but the incidence in African Americans is two to three times higher than in non-Hispanic whites. MM is also slightly more frequent in men than women (1.4:1). Many clinical trials lack appropriate representation of specific patient populations, limiting the generalizability of the evidence obtained. Therefore, we determined the representation of ethnic minorities, the elderly, and women in MM clinical trials. Methods: Enrollment data from all therapeutic trials reported as completed in clinicaltrial.gov from 2000 to 2016 were analyzed. Clinical trials including other hematologic malignancies and with recruitment outside of the U.S. were excluded. Enrollment fraction (EF) was defined as the number of enrollees divided by the 2013 SEER database MM complete prevalence. Chi-square test was used to estimate differences in categorical data. Results: Out of 177 MM clinical trials (CT), 78 (44%) reported ethnicity with a total of 12,055 enrollees. Regarding enrollees9 ethnic composition, 84% were non-Hispanic White (NHW), 8.6% African American (AA), 2.8% Asian, 1.8% Hispanic, and 0.1% Native American/Alaskan Indian. Out of those 78 CT, 52 (66%) were phase II, 15 (19%) phase III, and 11 (14%) phase I. Most of the results were published from 2012 to 2016 (74%). Forty-six (59%) trials were sponsored by industry, 7 (9%) by NCI, and 25 (32%) were investigator initiated. Participation in CT varied significantly across ethnic groups, NHW were more likely to be enrolled in CT (EF of 0.23) than AA (EF of 0.08, p Conclusions: Despite the higher incidence of MM in African Americans and the elderly, the former only represented 8.6% of the study participants and 66% of these were less than 65 years of age; therefore, we are lacking data in the tolerability of these new agents in our aging MM population. We also observed that industry studies were less likely to recruit AA patients. Collaborations between investigators, sponsors, and the community are necessary to increase our minority and elderly patients9 access to clinical trials. Citation Format: Narjust Duma, Miguel Gonzalez Velez, Jesus Vera-Aguilera, Richardo Parrondo, Veronica Mariotti, Jonas Paludo, Yucai Wang, Ronald Go, Alex Adjei. Diversity in multiple myeloma clinical trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr A27.","PeriodicalId":254061,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral and Social Science","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-A27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) accounts for approximately 1% of all cancers and 10% of hematologic malignancies in the United States (U.S.). MM occurs in all races, but the incidence in African Americans is two to three times higher than in non-Hispanic whites. MM is also slightly more frequent in men than women (1.4:1). Many clinical trials lack appropriate representation of specific patient populations, limiting the generalizability of the evidence obtained. Therefore, we determined the representation of ethnic minorities, the elderly, and women in MM clinical trials. Methods: Enrollment data from all therapeutic trials reported as completed in clinicaltrial.gov from 2000 to 2016 were analyzed. Clinical trials including other hematologic malignancies and with recruitment outside of the U.S. were excluded. Enrollment fraction (EF) was defined as the number of enrollees divided by the 2013 SEER database MM complete prevalence. Chi-square test was used to estimate differences in categorical data. Results: Out of 177 MM clinical trials (CT), 78 (44%) reported ethnicity with a total of 12,055 enrollees. Regarding enrollees9 ethnic composition, 84% were non-Hispanic White (NHW), 8.6% African American (AA), 2.8% Asian, 1.8% Hispanic, and 0.1% Native American/Alaskan Indian. Out of those 78 CT, 52 (66%) were phase II, 15 (19%) phase III, and 11 (14%) phase I. Most of the results were published from 2012 to 2016 (74%). Forty-six (59%) trials were sponsored by industry, 7 (9%) by NCI, and 25 (32%) were investigator initiated. Participation in CT varied significantly across ethnic groups, NHW were more likely to be enrolled in CT (EF of 0.23) than AA (EF of 0.08, p Conclusions: Despite the higher incidence of MM in African Americans and the elderly, the former only represented 8.6% of the study participants and 66% of these were less than 65 years of age; therefore, we are lacking data in the tolerability of these new agents in our aging MM population. We also observed that industry studies were less likely to recruit AA patients. Collaborations between investigators, sponsors, and the community are necessary to increase our minority and elderly patients9 access to clinical trials. Citation Format: Narjust Duma, Miguel Gonzalez Velez, Jesus Vera-Aguilera, Richardo Parrondo, Veronica Mariotti, Jonas Paludo, Yucai Wang, Ronald Go, Alex Adjei. Diversity in multiple myeloma clinical trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr A27.
A27:多发性骨髓瘤临床试验的多样性
背景:在美国,多发性骨髓瘤(MM)约占所有癌症的1%和血液恶性肿瘤的10%。MM发生在所有种族,但非裔美国人的发病率是非西班牙裔白人的两到三倍。MM在男性中的发病率也略高于女性(1.4:1)。许多临床试验缺乏对特定患者群体的适当代表,限制了所获得证据的普遍性。因此,我们确定了少数民族、老年人和女性在MM临床试验中的代表性。方法:分析2000年至2016年在clinicaltrial.gov上完成的所有治疗试验的入组数据。包括其他血液恶性肿瘤和美国以外招募的临床试验被排除在外。入组分数(EF)定义为入组人数除以2013年SEER数据库MM完全患病率。用卡方检验估计分类资料的差异。结果:在177项MM临床试验(CT)中,78项(44%)报告了种族,共12,055名受试者。关于入组者的种族构成,84%为非西班牙裔白人(NHW), 8.6%为非洲裔美国人(AA), 2.8%为亚洲人,1.8%为西班牙裔,0.1%为美洲原住民/阿拉斯加印第安人。在这78例CT中,52例(66%)为II期,15例(19%)为III期,11例(14%)为i期。大多数结果发表于2012年至2016年(74%)。46项(59%)试验由工业界赞助,7项(9%)由NCI赞助,25项(32%)由研究者发起。不同种族人群的CT参与程度差异显著,NHW比AA更有可能参加CT (EF为0.23)(EF为0.08,p)。结论:尽管非裔美国人和老年人的MM发病率更高,但前者仅占研究参与者的8.6%,其中66%年龄小于65岁;因此,我们缺乏这些新药在老年MM人群中的耐受性数据。我们还观察到,行业研究不太可能招募AA患者。研究者、赞助者和社区之间的合作是增加少数族裔和老年患者参与临床试验的必要条件。引文格式:Narjust Duma, Miguel Gonzalez Velez, Jesus Vera-Aguilera, ricardo Parrondo, Veronica Mariotti, Jonas Paludo, Yucai Wang, Ronald Go, Alex Adjei。多发性骨髓瘤临床试验的多样性[摘要]。见:第十届AACR会议论文集:种族/少数民族和医疗服务不足人群的癌症健康差异科学;2017年9月25-28日;亚特兰大,乔治亚州。费城(PA): AACR;癌症流行病学杂志,2018;27(7增刊):摘要nr A27。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信