Techniques for Automatic Magnetic Resonance Image Classification

Hsian-Min Chen, Shih-Yu Chen, J. Chai, C. Chen, Chao-Cheng Wu, Y. Ouyang, C. Tsai, Ching-Wen Yang, San-Kan Lee, Chein-I. Chang
{"title":"Techniques for Automatic Magnetic Resonance Image Classification","authors":"Hsian-Min Chen, Shih-Yu Chen, J. Chai, C. Chen, Chao-Cheng Wu, Y. Ouyang, C. Tsai, Ching-Wen Yang, San-Kan Lee, Chein-I. Chang","doi":"10.1109/ICGEC.2010.186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Designing and developing automatic techniques for magnetic resonance images (MR) for data analysis is very challenging. One popular and public available method, FAST (FMRIB Automatic Segmentation Tool) has been widely used for automatic brain tissue segmentation for this purpose. This paper investigates limitations of this software algorithm on implementation and further develops a new approach to automatic MR brain tissue classification. The proposed new technique first implements an unsupervised training sample generation process (UTSGP) which includes a Pixel Purity Index (PPI) to generate an initial set of training samples that are further refined by a Support Vector Machine. The resulting training samples are then as a set of training samples for an Iterative Fisher’s Linear Discriminant Analysis (IFLDA) which implements FLDA iteratively to improve classification. In order to conduct a fair comparison synthetic images are used for performance evaluation. Experimental results show that our proposed technique is superior in practical implementation to this software algorithm in several aspects of generalization ability, flexibility of choosing number of classes to be classified, avoidance of inconsistent results caused by different initial conditions.","PeriodicalId":373949,"journal":{"name":"2010 Fourth International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computing","volume":"222 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Fourth International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGEC.2010.186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Designing and developing automatic techniques for magnetic resonance images (MR) for data analysis is very challenging. One popular and public available method, FAST (FMRIB Automatic Segmentation Tool) has been widely used for automatic brain tissue segmentation for this purpose. This paper investigates limitations of this software algorithm on implementation and further develops a new approach to automatic MR brain tissue classification. The proposed new technique first implements an unsupervised training sample generation process (UTSGP) which includes a Pixel Purity Index (PPI) to generate an initial set of training samples that are further refined by a Support Vector Machine. The resulting training samples are then as a set of training samples for an Iterative Fisher’s Linear Discriminant Analysis (IFLDA) which implements FLDA iteratively to improve classification. In order to conduct a fair comparison synthetic images are used for performance evaluation. Experimental results show that our proposed technique is superior in practical implementation to this software algorithm in several aspects of generalization ability, flexibility of choosing number of classes to be classified, avoidance of inconsistent results caused by different initial conditions.
磁共振图像自动分类技术
设计和开发用于数据分析的自动磁共振图像技术是非常具有挑战性的。FAST (FMRIB自动分割工具)是一种流行且公开可用的方法,已被广泛用于自动脑组织分割。本文研究了该软件算法在实现上的局限性,并进一步开发了一种新的MR脑组织自动分类方法。提出的新技术首先实现了一个无监督训练样本生成过程(UTSGP),该过程包括像素纯度指数(PPI),以生成一组初始训练样本,并由支持向量机进一步细化。然后将得到的训练样本作为迭代费雪线性判别分析(IFLDA)的一组训练样本,迭代费雪线性判别分析实现迭代费雪线性判别分析以改进分类。为了进行公平的比较,使用合成图像进行性能评估。实验结果表明,本文提出的方法在实际实现中,在泛化能力、选择分类类数的灵活性、避免不同初始条件导致结果不一致等方面都优于该软件算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信